On Saturday 31 May 2003 13:54, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
The reason to me seems that you don't
provide a lot of fancy named links to libdb.a.
That's correct. But IMHO those fancy names are nasty and I think we
should not play this game in OpenPKG, because it introduces mud into the
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2003, Tassilo Erlewein wrote:
...
Linux Distros do it this way, yes. A clean system where you just have
a single version of Berkeley-DB for all packages usually do not want
those libfoo-VERSION.a stuff. In OpenPKG
On Sun, May 18, 2003, Tassilo Erlewein wrote:
I found that some packages' configure scripts fail to detect the
openpkg libdb.
Really? Which particular packages? AFAIL we've already patched some
packages to correctly pick up our Berkeley-DB some time ago before
OpenPKG 1.2.
The reason to me
