Re: openpkg current and perl.req

2004-03-23 Thread Thomas Lotterer
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Matthias Kurz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote: > > > [...] As I understand it, the openpkg-dev package is only available > > via a CVS checkout. [...] > Yes via CVS but no need to checkout. > > I just spent some time poking around the OpenPKG web site, bu

Re: openpkg current and perl.req

2004-03-23 Thread Matthias Kurz
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote: [...] > As I understand it, the openpkg-dev package is only available via a CVS > checkout. I just spent some time poking around the OpenPKG web site, but > can't find anything about the login procedures for anonymous login and > checkout from the CVS tr

Re: openpkg current and perl.req

2004-03-23 Thread Bill Campbell
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: >On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote: > >> While working to get my courier-imap package running under release 2.0 with >> openpkg from the current tree, I ran into a problem where it failed in >> dependency checking looking for the %{l_prefix}/

Re: openpkg current and perl.req

2004-03-23 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote: > While working to get my courier-imap package running under release 2.0 with > openpkg from the current tree, I ran into a problem where it failed in > dependency checking looking for the %{l_prefix}/lib/openpkg/perl.req > script. Looking at the openpkg

openpkg current and perl.req

2004-03-23 Thread Bill Campbell
While working to get my courier-imap package running under release 2.0 with openpkg from the current tree, I ran into a problem where it failed in dependency checking looking for the %{l_prefix}/lib/openpkg/perl.req script. Looking at the openpkg.spec file, this file is explicitly removed in the %