suPHP on apache, howto?

2005-09-07 Thread Birger Krägelin
Hi, does anybody use suPHP on apache? I want to secure my server, which currently hosts about 600 users. When I build apache with mod_suphp, everything goes well. In apache.base there is a minimal configuration for suphp but I cannot find an example for openpkg-setup. I read the docs for

Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Openpkg
Hi All, I'm trying to install Kolab2 on an AMD64 box although some packages fail with various compile errors because they are not 64-bit compatible. Is it possible to explicitly define a different architecture (either in obmtool.conf or as an argument to the obmtool script) so that 32-bit

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005, Openpkg wrote: I'm trying to install Kolab2 on an AMD64 box although some packages fail with various compile errors because they are not 64-bit compatible. Is it possible to explicitly define a different architecture (either in obmtool.conf or as an argument to the

Re: suPHP on apache, howto?

2005-09-07 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
the package install a pre-adjusted suphp.conf now. The changes you can see under http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=24956 and the results are available with CURRENT's apache-1.3.33-20050907 and higher. Please give us feedback whether the fixed fully solved your problem. I'll then MFC them to OpenPKG 2.4

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Steve Weinreich
--On Dienstag, 6. September 2005 13:49 +0100 Openpkg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to install Kolab2 on an AMD64 box although some packages fail with various compile errors because they are not 64-bit compatible. Hi Andy! I am also fighting with a Debian 3.1 based Amd64

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Openpkg
Hi, I was having problems with the fsl package in the kolab release (fsl-1.5.0-2.2.0.src.rpm) however downloading a newer copy (fsl-1.6.0-2.3.0.src.rpm) compiled fine. Kolab uses openpkg-2.2.3 btw, is it 'safe' to use newer packages like I did? The big issue now is with sasl. Kolab2 ships

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Peter S. Mazinger
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Openpkg wrote: Hi, I was having problems with the fsl package in the kolab release (fsl-1.5.0-2.2.0.src.rpm) however downloading a newer copy (fsl-1.6.0-2.3.0.src.rpm) compiled fine. Kolab uses openpkg-2.2.3 btw, is it 'safe' to use newer packages like I did?

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Openpkg
Hi Steve, What version of gcc are you using? My FC4 box comes with gcc-4.0, however I had to downgrade to gcc3 in order to get as far as I have. These are the instructions I followed: http://www.kolab.org/pipermail/kolab-users/2005-August/003343.html. There's debian binaries btw... They may

Re: slurpd/slapd - short update

2005-09-07 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005, hms wrote: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: PS: Have I already mentioned that OpenLDAP for me becomes more and more a good candidate for the most favorite package, directly following the all-dancing-all-singing-and-always-causing-trouble SASL? ;-) And don't forget to ask

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005, Openpkg wrote: I was having problems with the fsl package in the kolab release (fsl-1.5.0-2.2.0.src.rpm) however downloading a newer copy (fsl-1.6.0-2.3.0.src.rpm) compiled fine. Kolab uses openpkg-2.2.3 btw, is it 'safe' to use newer packages like I did? The big issue

Re: Build 32-bit packages on 64-bit system

2005-09-07 Thread Steve Weinreich
correctly under amd64*-linux*. Give it a try. Next step for me is to compile the rest of the CORE and BASE package on my amd64-debian3.1 box. Lets see whats happening.. [1] ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/gcc-3.4.4-20050907.src.rpm cheerio Steve -- Steve Weinreich [EMAIL PROTECTED