Hi,
does anybody use suPHP on apache? I want to secure my server, which currently
hosts about 600 users.
When I build apache with mod_suphp, everything goes well. In apache.base there
is a minimal configuration for suphp but I cannot find an example for
openpkg-setup. I read the docs for
Hi All,
I'm trying to install Kolab2 on an AMD64 box although some packages fail with
various compile errors because they are not 64-bit compatible.
Is it possible to explicitly define a different architecture (either in
obmtool.conf or as an argument to the obmtool script) so that 32-bit
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005, Openpkg wrote:
I'm trying to install Kolab2 on an AMD64 box although some packages fail with
various compile errors because they are not 64-bit compatible.
Is it possible to explicitly define a different architecture (either in
obmtool.conf or as an argument to the
the
package install a pre-adjusted suphp.conf now. The changes you can see
under http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=24956 and the results are
available with CURRENT's apache-1.3.33-20050907 and higher. Please give
us feedback whether the fixed fully solved your problem. I'll then MFC
them to OpenPKG 2.4
--On Dienstag, 6. September 2005 13:49 +0100 Openpkg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to install Kolab2 on an AMD64 box although some packages fail
with various compile errors because they are not 64-bit compatible.
Hi Andy!
I am also fighting with a Debian 3.1 based Amd64
Hi,
I was having problems with the fsl package in the kolab release (fsl-1.5.0-2.2.0.src.rpm) however downloading a newer copy (fsl-1.6.0-2.3.0.src.rpm) compiled fine. Kolab uses openpkg-2.2.3 btw, is it 'safe' to use newer packages like I did?
The big issue now is with sasl. Kolab2 ships
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Openpkg wrote:
Hi,
I was having problems with the fsl package in the kolab release
(fsl-1.5.0-2.2.0.src.rpm) however downloading a newer
copy (fsl-1.6.0-2.3.0.src.rpm) compiled fine. Kolab uses openpkg-2.2.3 btw,
is it 'safe' to use newer packages like I
did?
Hi Steve,
What version of gcc are you using? My FC4 box comes with gcc-4.0, however I had to downgrade to gcc3 in order to get as far as I have. These are the instructions I followed: http://www.kolab.org/pipermail/kolab-users/2005-August/003343.html.
There's debian binaries btw... They may
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005, hms wrote:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
PS: Have I already mentioned that OpenLDAP for me becomes more and more
a good candidate for the most favorite package, directly following
the all-dancing-all-singing-and-always-causing-trouble SASL? ;-)
And don't forget to ask
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005, Openpkg wrote:
I was having problems with the fsl package in the kolab release
(fsl-1.5.0-2.2.0.src.rpm) however downloading a newer copy
(fsl-1.6.0-2.3.0.src.rpm) compiled fine. Kolab uses openpkg-2.2.3 btw, is it
'safe' to use newer packages like I did?
The big issue
correctly under amd64*-linux*. Give it a try. Next step for me is to
compile the rest of the CORE and BASE package on my amd64-debian3.1 box.
Lets see whats happening..
[1] ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/gcc-3.4.4-20050907.src.rpm
cheerio
Steve
--
Steve Weinreich [EMAIL PROTECTED
11 matches
Mail list logo