Re: install issue on openpkg-20050920-20050920.powerpc-aix5.1-ope.sh ?

2005-09-23 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote: When doing a fresh install of openpkg from current I notice the following installing openpkg binary openpkg-20050920-20050920.powerpc-aix5.1-ope.sh OpenPKG CURRENT Binary Bootstrap Package, version 20050920 Built for prefix /openpkg on target

openpkg CURRENT

2005-09-23 Thread Doug Henry
Are there some not-so-current repositories of CURRENT somewhere? I would like to get a hold of 1.32 version of boost to compare with the 1.33 version (which doesn't seem to work correctly).

webmin package

2005-09-23 Thread Doug Henry
I was happy to see that webmin is in current now. I am wondering why many modules seem to be left out (e.g. nfs exports, samba)? I assume it is because this package is young and possibly not configured correctly, but I think most of those modules are standard issue, so some work must have went in

Re: openpkg CURRENT

2005-09-23 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005, Doug Henry wrote: Are there some not-so-current repositories of CURRENT somewhere? I would like to get a hold of 1.32 version of boost to compare with the 1.33 version (which doesn't seem to work correctly). No, CURRENT is always just current. If you want CURRENT from

Re: webmin package

2005-09-23 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005, Doug Henry wrote: I was happy to see that webmin is in current now. I am wondering why many modules seem to be left out (e.g. nfs exports, samba)? I assume it is because this package is young and possibly not configured correctly, but I think most of those modules are

Re: webmin package

2005-09-23 Thread Bill Campbell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2005, Doug Henry wrote: I was happy to see that webmin is in current now. I am wondering why many modules seem to be left out (e.g. nfs exports, samba)? I assume it is because this package is young and possibly not configured