On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Miles Egan wrote:
> So, I've been considering how I would deploy openpkg and I'm unsure on one
> procedural point.
>
> I'm sure we'll have to make a few patches and changes to the 1.1.0 packages as
> we start to use openpkg more extensively. What's the recommended policy fo
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Miles Egan wrote:
>[...]
> I'm guessing we wouldn't want to start numbering our own releases
> 1.1.x, right? Would we then start using date stamped release numbers?
>
> Put more simply, if we have to maintain our own temporary sub-forks of some
> packages how could we do th
