Re: sendmail-8.13.3-20050112 improvements

2005-02-14 Thread Mark Keller
As for sendmail improvements. Is there any good reason that programs like vacation are being installed suid root in the "files" section of the sendmail.spec? At least on our systems that actually breaks the vacation functionality and is a potential security vulnerability. I just use cfengine to

Re: sendmail-8.13.3-20050112 improvements

2005-02-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005, stephane Lentz wrote: > [...] > => BTW, there are is a sendmail 8.13.3 patch around that maybe should > be taken into account see : > http://www.sendmail.org/8.13.3.html#ERRATA > [...] Now included into the OpenPKG-CURRENT "sendmail" package. Thanks for the hint.

Re: sendmail-8.13.3-20050112 improvements

2005-02-09 Thread stephane Lentz
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:07:09 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Most of the ideas come from the FreeBSD sendmail port (thks dirk for > > your efforts) : > > - ability to disable IPV6 support > > - ability to use picky_helo_check > > - ability to use socketmap > > Good

Re: sendmail-8.13.3-20050112 improvements

2005-02-09 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005, stephane Lentz wrote: > There several Openpkg sendmail.spec improvements I'm thinking about > that I would be glad to see included in next Openpkg release. > > Most of the ideas come from the FreeBSD sendmail port (thks dirk for > your efforts) : > - ability to disable IPV6 s

sendmail-8.13.3-20050112 improvements

2005-02-08 Thread stephane Lentz
There several Openpkg sendmail.spec improvements I'm thinking about that I would be glad to see included in next Openpkg release. Most of the ideas come from the FreeBSD sendmail port (thks dirk for your efforts) : - ability to disable IPV6 support - ability to use picky_helo_check - ability to