Aaron Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This works in 2.0. 2.1 may be a little different. You have to install
these in this order on all machines to get the 'build' tool working:
openpkg
make
binutils
gcc
perl
openpkg-tools
[snip]
If you have a lot of servers, you may want to
Hi everyone,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:20:57PM -0500, Aaron Bostick wrote:
This works in 2.0. 2.1 may be a little different. You have to install
these in this order on all machines to get the 'build' tool working:
openpkg
make
binutils
gcc
perl
openpkg-tools
yes and no. The build
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004, Simon J Mudd wrote:
Re Simon,
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) [...]
If you know better than rpm that a binary package can be used on a
particular system or you just want to give it a try then convince rpm
using the --ignoreos or --ignorearch
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004, Simon J Mudd wrote:
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) [...]
If you know better than rpm that a binary package can be used on a
particular system or you just want to give it a try then
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004, Simon Mudd wrote:
Re,
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) [...]
I also tried to adjust the shtool [...] producing the following 2 files:
openpkg-2.1.0-2.1.0.ix86-rhel3.0-ope.rpm
openpkg-2.1.0-2.1.0.ix86-rhel3.0-ope.sh
This installed [...] but
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004, Simon Mudd wrote:
Re,
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) [...]
I also tried to adjust the shtool [...] producing the following 2 files:
openpkg-2.1.0-2.1.0.ix86-rhel3.0-ope.rpm
Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004, Simon Mudd wrote:
Re Simon,
openpkg-tools [...] not provide much
information unless I read the perl source.
you don't have to. Try
$ openpkg man build
Yes, I see (now). I was just surprised to not see the man
