osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc | 20
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/evt.cc | 4 +++-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/include/avnd_cb.h | 1 +
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/include/avnd_evt.h | 1 +
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/mds.cc |
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
* The MDS thread is changing data in the control block. It should only send a
message to the main thread.
Since the flow of TIPC flicker and node failover happening
Feldt; Hans Nordebäck; Praveen Malviya; Mathivanan Naickan
Palanivelu; Suryanarayana Garlapati
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
Hi Hans,
Please check so that I
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
As I said this problem originates from a low memory condition on the payload
that results in TIPC on that payload resets the link(s). Once TIPC links
: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
one basic question:
If the bearer is dual, tipc flickering on one link should be transparent
and there will be no effect to applications
November 2013 12:56
To: Nagendra Kumar; Suryanarayana Garlapati; Hans Nordebäck; Praveen Malviya;
Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
As I
Malviya; Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
As I said this problem originates from a low memory condition on the
payload that results in TIPC
09:41
To: Nagendra Kumar; Hans Feldt; Hans Nordebäck; Praveen Malviya;
Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link
between Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
one basic question
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link
between Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
Just to sort out node fencing and recap the architecture we have I checked
old and new code.
In 3.x, avd upon detecting heartbeat loss, would inform
]
Sent: den 18 november 2013 09:41
To: Nagendra Kumar; Hans Feldt; Hans Nordebäck; Praveen Malviya;
Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link
between Controller and Payload flickers [#600
: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when
link between Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
As I said this problem originates from a low memory condition on
the
payload that results in TIPC on that payload resets the link(s).
Once TIPC links are re-established
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link
between Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
-Original Message-
From: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
[mailto:mathi.naic...@oracle.com]
Sent: den 18 november 2013 11:07
To: Hans
: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
Hi,
I checked and it looks no easy possibility for detecting link loss at
controller AvD as it gets AvND down and Avnd UP in the tipc flicker. This is
the same even when payload goes down
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: Reboot payload when link between
Controller and Payload flickers [#600]
Hi Hans,
Any response ?
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Nagendra Kumar
Sent: 15 November 2013 14:39
To: Suryanarayana Garlapati; hans.fe...@ericsson.com
Hi,
I checked and it looks no easy possibility for detecting link loss at
controller AvD as it gets AvND down and Avnd UP in the tipc flicker. This is
the same even when payload goes down and rejoins. Only time difference is the
differentiator between these two scenario.
Hans: Can you please
Hi Surya,
The problem I see with the approach is : because of problem in payload, others
payload is impacted because of Act controller failover.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Suryanarayana Garlapati
Sent: 21 October 2013 18:22
To: Nagendra Kumar; hans.fe...@ericsson.com;
16 matches
Mail list logo
