Re: [opensc-devel] 2048 bit rsa problem

2006-11-13 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
Hmmm. forgot to respond to this part in my earlier mail. --On Monday, November 13, 2006 11:56:13 PM +0100 Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so if t=1 shouldn't be a problem and cryptoflex does both t=0 and t=1 I think I do not think cryptoflex supports T=1. certainly, its ATR does

Re: [opensc-devel] 2048 bit rsa problem

2006-11-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Chaskiel M Grundman wrote: --On Monday, November 13, 2006 11:20:11 PM +0100 Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: currently ignore the first line, as we don't select t=1 for cards that can do it, and thus run into problems. The only case that openct (in ifd_protocol_select) won't us

Re: [opensc-devel] 2048 bit rsa problem

2006-11-13 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
--On Monday, November 13, 2006 11:20:11 PM +0100 Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: currently ignore the first line, as we don't select t=1 for cards that can do it, and thus run into problems. The only case that openct (in ifd_protocol_select) won't use T=1 is if the default pro

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Nils Larsch wrote: I already tested 2048 bit rsa signatures with an etoken pro using openct so at least it seems to work for cardos. it also works with openct + ccid driver + cryptoflex 32k egate. but: only for some readers. for example all scm readers won't work. Regards, Andreas

[opensc-devel] 2048 bit rsa problem

2006-11-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
sorry guys, I realize I know a lot less than I should know about all these subjects, so as a result I'm still very confused. the start of my discussion with chaskiel was this > the scmscr3320 and hp-keyboard appear to have dwMaxCCIDMessageLength > less than 271 bytes. They therefore fail to proc

Re: [opensc-devel] Using engine_pkcs11 with openssl for OCSP

2006-11-13 Thread Nils Larsch
Jesus Luna wrote: Hello, Our OCSP Responder is based on Apache's mod_ssl and uses openssl libraries to perform crypto operations (i.e. signing the Responses). These days I've been trying to implement HSM support with the PKCS11 DLL provided by the crypto device manufacturer (Spain's RealSec). Wh

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Nils Larsch
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: lets test first, if it doesn't work... test what ? If we globally restrict the buffer size we certainly will have problems with some tokens (etokens pro with 2048 bit keys, note: cardos m4.2 doesn't have a GET RESPONSE command => every byte that doesn't fit into the r

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenCT 0.6.10 released

2006-11-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Alessandro Premoli wrote: Andreas Jellinghaus ha scritto: This new version only fixes a few minor bugs: * implement usb reset (Andrey Jivsov) Only for linux: ouch, true. didn't think of that, and noone tested openct except on linux :( please test with attached patch and let me know if it wo

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Peter Stuge wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:53:00PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: if limiting all readers to 248 bytes doesn't hurt anyone, then this is the best way from my point of view. But it does hurt. In my case the readers need to go to 256 bytes of data. Its the old card t

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: Nils Larsch wrote: well, it depends on whether this is card 'feature' or a limitation of the card reader. Card reader - the same card works fine in some readers, not in others. unfortunatly it is not even detectable via the driver - some ccid readers work fine,

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: +/* need to limit to 248 */ +if (card->max_send_size > 248) +card->max_send_size = 248; +if (card->max_recv_size > 248) +card->max_recv_size = 248; + + can we put something like this in the generic code for all cards and drivers? or in

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
--On Monday, November 13, 2006 09:23:06 AM +0100 Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have no clue: would that restrict them? i.e. take functionality away? or would opensc only split one command into several smaller ones and thus preserve functionality, but add more communication

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC current status, next steps.

2006-11-13 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On 30/10/06, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Hello Martin, I suggest we try to follow some bits from http://www.divmod.org/trac/ wiki/UltimateQualityDevelopmentSystem and I would like to make at least two branches for such bigger improvements on opensc-projec.org svn. I don

RE: [opensc-devel] Using engine_pkcs11 with openssl for OCSP

2006-11-13 Thread Jesus Luna
Hello, Our OCSP Responder is based on Apache's mod_ssl and uses openssl libraries to perform crypto operations (i.e. signing the Responses). These days I've been trying to implement HSM support with the PKCS11 DLL provided by the crypto device manufacturer (Spain's RealSec). When searching PKCS11

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenCT 0.6.10 released

2006-11-13 Thread Alessandro Premoli
Andreas Jellinghaus ha scritto: This new version only fixes a few minor bugs: * implement usb reset (Andrey Jivsov) Only for linux: cc -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=athlon-mp -D_THREAD_SAFE -o .libs/ifdhandler ifdhandler.o -L/usr/local/lib ./.libs/libifd.a /usr/home/alex/freeb

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Andrey Jivsov wrote: First, it is unclear what number 248 represents. The lowest common denominator? T=1 adds 4 bytes of headers+checksum, which gives us 252: still smaller than 255 or 254 that one might expect to see... if I remember the statistic ludovic did, all readers support at least 240

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3053] update; patch supploed by Douglas E.

2006-11-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
lets test first, if it doesn't work... in opensc.conf I see we have max_send_size and max_read_size already, but only in reader section. but the ctx.c code looks generic, so we could copy that example setting to reader openct section as well? no further code changes are necessary to test lower s