Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> well, a smart card might allow access to many machines. so I care a lot
> more about the single smart card (where I maybe only have one backup),
> than about a single machine - can be always reinstalled or restored.
That's correct but not relevant for this discussion. I
Andreas, hi,
[please Cc me on replies]
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> thanks. I think smart card pins are too important to be passed to other
> modules. so I removed that code completely.
I have to disagree here. Smart card pins are indeed sensitive but I
think that PAM is trustworthy enough to hand
I have to disagree here. Smart card pins are indeed sensitive but I
think that PAM is trustworthy enough to handle it.
After all, it handles plain user passwords -even root's- on pretty much
every Unix system. And passwords are *more* sensitive than PINs because
they are sufficient for authenticat
On 19/12/06, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
stef, peter: I left two files out becuse I wasn't sure if it would be
ok: card-belpic.c and netkey-tool.c both have several strings that are
printed (I guess at least) in iso8859-1 encoding. if we convert those
to utf-8, will it still wo
thanks. I think smart card pins are too important to be passed to other
modules. so I removed that code completely.
Regards, Andreas
___
opensc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/open
