Re: [opensc-devel] [Libchipcard-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On 03.05.2007, at 1:36, Martin Preuss wrote: > I don't think that reader manufacturers care that much about Linux > (some do, > but the majority doesn't). Meanwhile we have to deal with the > situation as it > is. Agreed. But also - if there is clear indication from the community - what do

Re: [opensc-devel] [Libchipcard-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:52, Martin Paljak wrote: > On 03.05.2007, at 0:38, Martin Preuss wrote: [...] > > In general I don't have problems with having a variety of APIs > > (although one > > single API would greatly simplify the application programmers work) > > as long > > as none of them trie

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Justin Karneges wrote: However, I do agree that StartCom is a nice service... is enough for me to recommend its usage. Both thumbs up! For the Psi XMPP client project, we plan to distribute the StartCom root certificate with the client Also here, both thumbs up...obviously we know about your

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: hu? our official statistic tells me: Firefox Nein 5556 45.2 % MS Internet Explorer Nein 2855 23.2 % Hey Andreas, that's cool! Much better than expected even... so I could use startcom. Good! the more important questions is: but why do we need an offici

Re: [opensc-devel] [Libchipcard-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On 03.05.2007, at 0:38, Martin Preuss wrote: > I don't like this situation any more than you do, but that's how it > is right > now. In this situation I don't find it helpfull if any interface > exclusively > grabs all readers, thereby blocking any other interface. > > I know that at least the

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

On 03.05.2007, at 0:01, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > On Wednesday 02 May 2007 19:59:37 Nils Larsch wrote: >> Martin Paljak wrote: >>> But real life statistics say: 80% users use IE (in Estonia) >> >> 80% of the opensc-project.org visitors use IE I'm little >> bit disappointed :-( I'm not say

Re: [opensc-devel] [Libchipcard-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:13, Martin Paljak wrote: [...] > My question: Do you really want to talk to a reader ? Can't you > communicate with the reader via pcsc (SCardControl should do that)? [...] Basically you are right, and that's why Libchipcard is card-centered (it rarely exposes the reade

Re: [opensc-devel] [Libchipcard-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On 03.05.2007, at 0:00, Micha Lenk wrote: > Please have a look at libchipcard[1]. In fact its [2]major design goal > was to abstract the details of reader access and communication and to > provide a unified and somewhat highlevel access on a chipcard - > independent of the actual reader type. > > 1

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

On Wednesday 02 May 2007 19:59:37 Nils Larsch wrote: > Martin Paljak wrote: > > On 02.05.2007, at 15:21, Alaric Dailey wrote: > >> StartCom has free certs, and is now accepted by most browsers. > > > > Nice service. > > > > But real life statistics say: 80% users use IE (in Estonia) > > 80% of the

Re: [opensc-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On 02.05.2007, at 9:25, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > On Tuesday 01 May 2007 23:24:00 Ville Skyttä wrote: >> Fedora uses /usr/lib(64)/pcsc/drivers and /usr/lib(64)/ctapi. FWIW, >> "readers" smells to me like a tad too generic name to use directly >> below >> /usr/lib(64). > > looks good to me, I

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

On Wednesday 02 May 2007 5:36 am, Martin Paljak wrote: > On 02.05.2007, at 15:21, Alaric Dailey wrote: > > StartCom has free certs, and is now accepted by most browsers. > > Nice service. > > But real life statistics say: 80% users use IE (in Estonia) > > So unless IE accepts the certificate ( I'l

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Nils Larsch wrote: 80% of the opensc-project.org visitors use IE I'm little bit disappointed :-( Nils At Distrowatch they announced that only 30 % are using an open source browser. Even less are using Linux...what a shame...But hey, even at the StartCom CA (see http://cert.startcom.org a

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Martin Paljak wrote: > On 02.05.2007, at 15:21, Alaric Dailey wrote: >> StartCom has free certs, and is now accepted by most browsers. > > Nice service. > > But real life statistics say: 80% users use IE (in Estonia) 80% of the opensc-project.org visitors use IE I'm little bit disappointed

Re: [opensc-devel] [Muscle] Re: Defining default paths for chipcard drivers

On Tuesday 01 May 2007 23:24:00 Ville Skyttä wrote: > Fedora uses /usr/lib(64)/pcsc/drivers and /usr/lib(64)/ctapi. FWIW, > "readers" smells to me like a tad too generic name to use directly below > /usr/lib(64). looks good to me, I think the "reader" term is too generic. even "card reader" is us

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Thank you Alaric for your suggestion. Actually we offered that already some time ago, but I think Andreas opted for not securing (Because of the need for a dedicated IP address?) Don't remember... However specially in Europa, the market share of IE is declining. For example read http://www.hei

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

On 02.05.2007, at 15:21, Alaric Dailey wrote: > StartCom has free certs, and is now accepted by most browsers. Nice service. But real life statistics say: 80% users use IE (in Estonia) So unless IE accepts the certificate ( I'll omit my comments on the green bar thing) it is not that good fo

Re: [opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Martin Paljak wrote: Today I found this: https://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/ssl/ssl_opensource.asp?ci=5988 Free for one year. Why not? S tartCom has free certs, and is now accepted by most browsers .

[opensc-devel] A 'real' web server certificate for opensc-project.org from godaddy

Today I found this: https://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/ssl/ssl_opensource.asp?ci=5988 Free for one year. Why not? -- Martin Paljak ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-

[opensc-devel] Any good howto/api....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I was wondering if there is a howto or an api for adding cards. I have a card (ACS ACOS1 8K) that I would like to add, but it is looking a bit more of an adventure then I want to undertake at the moment. Am I just missing something blindly obvious,