Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/11/1 Andreas Jellinghaus : > Am Sonntag 01 November 2009 12:25:26 schrieb Martin Paljak: >> On 01.11.2009, at 13:16, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: >> > Any objection to use PC/SC by default (again)? >> >> None. >> >> And +1 for making openct conflict with libccid as well. > > conflict is the negativ

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Kalev Lember
On 11/01/2009 04:43 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Sonntag 01 November 2009 13:06:49 schrieb Peter Stuge: >> Kalev Lember wrote: >>> I think the correct fix here would be in configure.ac: >>> -DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so.1" >>> +DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="libpcsc

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > well, maybe we shouldn't or at least by default not do that. > alon was working on an alternative implementation and thus > made it easy to configure, which library for the same > static interface is loaded. while this is real nice for

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Sonntag 01 November 2009 13:06:49 schrieb Peter Stuge: > Kalev Lember wrote: > > I think the correct fix here would be in configure.ac: > > -DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so.1" > > +DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="libpcsclite.so.1" > > > > One shouldn't make assumptions in w

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Sonntag 01 November 2009 12:25:26 schrieb Martin Paljak: > On 01.11.2009, at 13:16, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > Any objection to use PC/SC by default (again)? > > None. > > And +1 for making openct conflict with libccid as well. conflict is the negative equivalent of depends. is there some n

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Sonntag 01 November 2009 12:16:56 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > On Ubuntu libpcsclite is in /lib and not in /usr/lib. > See http://bugs.debian.org/531592 > > The Ubuntu opensc package should be patched to use a different path. > > I am not sure if the change from libpcsclite link at compilation

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Kalev Lember wrote: > I think the correct fix here would be in configure.ac: > -DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so.1" > +DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="libpcsclite.so.1" > > One shouldn't make assumptions in what directory libpcsclite.so.1 is > installed. I agree, -rpath is h

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Kalev Lember
On 11/01/2009 01:16 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > 2009/10/29 Hannu Kotipalo: >> Same in Ubuntu 9.10 (64 bit). There seems to be a missing symbolic link. >> This helped me: >> sudo ln -s /lib/libpcsclite.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/libpcsclite.so.1 > > On Ubuntu libpcsclite is in /lib and not in /usr/lib. > S

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Any objection to use PC/SC by default (again)? I for one prefer OpenCT. //Peter ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Martin Paljak
On 01.11.2009, at 13:16, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Any objection to use PC/SC by default (again)? None. And +1 for making openct conflict with libccid as well. -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +372.515.6495 ___ opensc-devel mailing li

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.11.11 released today

2009-11-01 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/10/29 Hannu Kotipalo : > Johannes Becker kirjoitti: >> >> Hello, >> >> when configuring OpenSC 0.11.11 under Debian lenny and squeeze I get >> >> PC/SC support:           no >> NSPlugin support:        no >> >> I have installed  libpcsclite-dev  (Version: 1.4.102-1) >> >> What else do I need?