On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 16:36 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Entersafe (or Feitian to be precise) has no docs, so it is hard to
> know what it can or can not support.
I asked FEITIAN for the technical documentation and I am waiting for the
answer.
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - jmpo...@goo
(U) Ludovic,
(U) Thank you for the quick action on this issues.
(U) Roy Keene
On 04/02/2010 04:48 PM, PKCS#11 Pam Module wrote:
#24: PKCS#11 Module initialized with incomplete data.
+---
Reporter: rkeene | Owner: s
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Jellinghaus schrieb:
>
> Firefox
> Edit / Preferences / ... (load opensc-pkcs11.so as module)
I am trying this with Karmic.
Are there any known issues with pcsc-lite?
On my machine upon loading I can see a very high CPU load, and cannot
log into my card.
Hello,
With the intent of helping new and existing developers and integrators build
applications that can work seamlessly with smart cards, a centralized resource
page is now on OpenSC wiki, named DeveloperInformation [1]
The idea of the page is to collect information about software development
On Apr 2, 2010, at 16:16 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Am Dienstag 30 März 2010 21:39:46 schrieb Martin Paljak:
>> I see it more like white (known to work) and black (known not to work
>> or known to work with documented issues) and gray (not
>> known/obsolete/historic).
>
> for example entersafe
Am Dienstag 30 März 2010 21:39:46 schrieb Martin Paljak:
> I see it more like white (known to work) and black (known not to work
> or known to work with documented issues) and gray (not
> known/obsolete/historic).
for example entersafe works, but only with a singe pin,
you can't create more than o
On Apr 2, 2010, at 15:43 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> I don't understand why you changed the default value of verbose
> from "0" to "-1". it only leeds to more complex code paths in many
> places.
>
> if you don't want to verwrite ctx->debug (fine with me), a
> single line change like this:
> -
I don't understand why you changed the default value of verbose
from "0" to "-1". it only leeds to more complex code paths in many
places.
if you don't want to verwrite ctx->debug (fine with me), a
single line change like this:
- ctx->debug = verbose;
+ if (verbose) ctx->debug = verbos
On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:33 , Anders Rundgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought that the main point with SCP (Secure Channel Protocol) was for
> performing secure (end-to-end) card initialization and updates.
Yes, that is one option.
But not related to what I'm trying to achieve (that with whatever type o
Hi,
I thought that the main point with SCP (Secure Channel Protocol) was for
performing secure (end-to-end) card initialization and updates. Since SCP
works on the APDU-level I have some difficulties understanding how you
make it useful from PKCS #11 since the mapping is not one-to-one.
Other r
Anders Rundgren wrote:
> Hi,
> How does GlobalPlatform's SCP fits into this picture?
>
IMHO, GP SCP is not related this subject;
roughly, SCP is secure transport layer at the APDUs level.
> Anders
>
> Martin Paljak wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> PKCS#11 is an API for cryptographic devices that pe
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:00 , Anders Rundgren wrote:
> Hi,
> How does GlobalPlatform's SCP fits into this picture?
If you mean GP secure channel then it does not relate to this problem, AFAIK,
at least not directly.
If the channel is set up between two hardware modules then it would matter.
For "c
Hi,
How does GlobalPlatform's SCP fits into this picture?
Anders
Martin Paljak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> PKCS#11 is an API for cryptographic devices that perform cryptographic
> operations.
> The API itself does not mandate the use of hardware (in fact, there are
> several competing software PKCS#11
13 matches
Mail list logo
