On 2010-07-18 13:34, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> On 2010-07-18 18:49, Stef Walter wrote:
>
>>
>> The missing piece is a common standard for specifying which PKCS#11
>> modules for an application to load.
>
> This is not what Microsoft and Apple offers.
>
> They offer a directory of providers. If a
On 2010-07-18 18:49, Stef Walter wrote:
>
> The missing piece is a common standard for specifying which PKCS#11
> modules for an application to load.
This is not what Microsoft and Apple offers.
They offer a directory of providers. If apps want to
discriminate against certain providers they can
On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 08:46 -0500, Stef Walter wrote:
> Well in GNOME we're implementing a foundation for usable crypto based
> around PKCS#11.
From a user point issue, it seems that Gnome Keyring manages different
types of keyrings: password, OpenPGP and OpenSSH. It has also limited
suport for P
On 2010-07-18 10:27, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010, um 00:16:15 schrieb Stef Walter:
>> Is there a spec around for specifying to applications which PKCS#11
>> modules to load and how to initialize them?
>>
>> I'm thinking something along the lines of PAM conf files, where you
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010, um 00:16:15 schrieb Stef Walter:
> Is there a spec around for specifying to applications which PKCS#11
> modules to load and how to initialize them?
>
> I'm thinking something along the lines of PAM conf files, where you can
> specify which PAM modules different applicatio
On 2010-07-18 15:46, Stef Walter wrote:
> I'm thinking of using PAM for ideas. If you're familiar with PAM the
> following will make sense:
>
> * Directory of configuration files one per application.
> * Each file specifies modules to load.
> * Default configuration file when an application do
On 2010-07-18 01:33, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> BTW, isn't there
> an effort establishing NSS as the Linux crypto platform?
Well in GNOME we're implementing a foundation for usable crypto based
around PKCS#11. We're 'equal opportunity' for crypto libraries. Although
NSS is a big player, and have put
On 2010-07-17 18:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Stef Walter wrote:
>> Is there a spec around for specifying to applications which PKCS#11
>> modules to load
>
> That's application specific.
>
>> I'm thinking something along the lines of PAM conf files, where you
>> can specify which PAM modules differe
