On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 02:08 +0200, Emanuele Pucciarelli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:59, Andre Zepezauer > This particular card isn't important at all. But it shows, that the
> > select_file function doesn't work for an iso card. I had to write code,
> > to read the contents of this one. Bu
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:59, Andre Zepezauer This particular card isn't important at all. But it shows, that the
> select_file function doesn't work for an iso card. I had to write code,
> to read the contents of this one. But I really would like to use
> opensc-explorer for such a task. For exa
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 21:10 +0200, Emanuele Pucciarelli wrote:
> Hi Andre!
>
> Thanks for the remarks!
>
> > It works very well, right now. I have a modified cardos driver, which
> > uses both functions (signing and decipherment from iso7816.c) with keys
> > of 2048 bit. Seems to me, that there i
Hi Andre!
Thanks for the remarks!
> It works very well, right now. I have a modified cardos driver, which
> uses both functions (signing and decipherment from iso7816.c) with keys
> of 2048 bit. Seems to me, that there is nothing to be done here.
Good to hear. Are you using reader-pcsc?
> @mart
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 17:11 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Emanuele Pucciarelli wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 13:45, Martin Paljak wrote:
> >> iso7816.c should not be taken as a final, static code, if there are checks
> >> missing from there, it is OK to improve i
2010/8/16 Emanuele Pucciarelli :
> Hi Kalev,
>
>> gcc warns about a potential buffer overflow:
>
> […]
>
> Thanks! I'll fix that in both places (lines 540 and 552).
>
> To be honest, no overflow should ever happen, as the label is always a
> static string; nevertheless, those lines are ugly, and I
Hi Kalev,
> gcc warns about a potential buffer overflow:
[…]
Thanks! I'll fix that in both places (lines 540 and 552).
To be honest, no overflow should ever happen, as the label is always a
static string; nevertheless, those lines are ugly, and I think gcc is
right in complaining about that. :)
gcc warns about a potential buffer overflow:
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:642:0,
from pkcs15-itacns.c:38:
In function 'strncat',
inlined from 'itacns_add_keyset.clone.3' at pkcs15-itacns.c:540:9:
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:154:3: warning: call to
__builtin___
On 06/09/2010 09:17 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
> On May 26, 2010, at 23:21 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>> are there any plans for new version?
>> * what happend to opensc 0.11.*? I thought the problem with
>> gost / engine_pkcs11 is so big, it should be fixed in
>> the 0.11 line to help normal u
