On 2010/12/07 16:03, Martin Paljak wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
>
>> On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>>
>>>
[1]
http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWindowsenvironmentdescription
>>> Here the Op
On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
> On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWindowsenvironmentdescription
>>>
>> Here the OpenSC dlls are installed into 'system32'.
>> Can an a
On 2010/12/07 2:36, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>> [1]
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/WindowsInstaller#PossibleinstallerstepsWindowsenvironmentdescription
>>
> Here the OpenSC dlls are installed into 'system32'.
> Can an alternative method, like changing of the 'PATH' variable, be a
Am Montag 06 Dezember 2010, um 19:44:58 schrieb Martin Paljak:
> Hello,
>
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > Personally I'd be interested in:
> > * cheap jcop cards (contact only, dual interface, or
> >
> > as cheap usb stick). and of course resellers that sell
> > the
Hello,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
> Personally I'd be interested in:
> * cheap jcop cards (contact only, dual interface, or
> as cheap usb stick). and of course resellers that sell
> them at reasonable price (low quantities, like only one or
> only five).
Why JCOP
Hi everyone,
is anyone going to cartes? that is the biggest smart card exhibition
as far as I know, in paris 7.12. - 9.12., i.e. starting tomorrow.
If so, please feel free to send report, I guess everyone is
interested about all the new stuff you can tell us about.
Personally I'd be interested i
Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>> to reflect the commonly used template for the path to the windows registers
>> that the smart card producers are using
>>
> Following the common practices of a platform is a good idea. Yet it sometimes
> feel t
On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> Is there any reason with libopensc.pc is not installed? It looks
> like r4081 deleted the line:
> pkgconfig_DATA = libopensc.pc
>
> Was this on purpose?
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API but use PKCS#11.
It is
Is there any reason with libopensc.pc is not installed? It looks
like r4081 deleted the line:
pkgconfig_DATA = libopensc.pc
Was this on purpose?
--
Douglas E. Engert
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
Hello,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> to reflect the commonly used template for the path to the windows registers
> that the smart card producers are using
Following the common practices of a platform is a good idea. Yet it sometimes
feel there is too much unnecessary bloat
Hi,
to reflect the commonly used template for the path to the windows registers
that the smart card producers are using
([HKEY_...]Software\[Manufacturer]\[ProductName]),
I would like to add one more level to the OpenSC windows registers path.
To finally have:
RegOpenKeyEx(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, "So
Hello,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Johannes Becker wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 02 Dezember 2010 schrieb Martin Paljak:
>
>>> Have you decided on a release date yet for 0.12.0?
>>
>> Either today or tomorrow.
>
> I tested opensc-0.12.0-rc1 on Debian Squeeze and on Windows XP.
> There is still the
Am Donnerstag 02 Dezember 2010 schrieb Martin Paljak:
> > Have you decided on a release date yet for 0.12.0?
>
> Either today or tomorrow.
I tested opensc-0.12.0-rc1 on Debian Squeeze and on Windows XP.
There is still the bug with our TCOS 2 Card, described
in my e-mail from 2010-09-02 12:21 an
13 matches
Mail list logo
