Ravneet Singh Khalsa wrote:
Is there equivalent command for Windows specific environment ?
The command seems to be pointing to engine_pkcs11.so and
opensc-pkcs11.so files. I couldn't find these files anywhere.
..
I am a programmer and I understand only programming languages.
It's good for
Hi all,
there is apparently a nasty bug in framework-pkcs15.c that causes a SIGV
when via PKCS#11 a certificate object is deleted, but not the related
public key object.
Occasionally this triggers a SIGV when the caller later accesses the
CKA_ID attribute which tries to access the then deleted
Hi Peter,
I will first need to write a small test in C to reproduce the problem.
Right now we test from Java, which makes debugging a real nightmare.
Andreas
Am 27.09.2012 11:25, schrieb Peter Stuge:
Andreas Schwier (ML) wrote:
there is apparently a nasty bug in framework-pkcs15.c that causes
Andreas Schwier wrote:
I will first need to write a small test in C to reproduce the problem.
Right now we test from Java, which makes debugging a real nightmare.
Maybe you can reproduce it using some of the existing command line
tools?
//Peter
___
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Andreas Schwier wrote:
I will first need to write a small test in C to reproduce the problem.
Right now we test from Java, which makes debugging a real nightmare.
Maybe you can reproduce it using some of the existing
Just tried the same.
There is also a SIGV if you try to delete the public key alone.
Apparently the public key object in the framework has no related object
in the pkcs15 layer.
Andreas
Am 27.09.2012 13:04, schrieb Viktor Tarasov:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Andreas Schwier
andreas.schw...@cardcontact.de wrote:
Just tried the same.
There is also a SIGV if you try to delete the public key alone.
Apparently the public key object in the framework has no related object
in the pkcs15 layer.
Public key PKCS#11
2012/9/27 Martin Paljak mar...@martinpaljak.net
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus
andr...@ionisiert.de wrote:
In my mind keys could optionally contain application-oriented ACL
telling
which
applications they trust so that even if you install a bad App, it
would
for
Il 23/09/2012 12:04, Andreas Jellinghaus ha scritto:
In my mind, the SE should take over display and touch controller by
hardware means, so absolutely no app can snoop user input or fake it.
Too bad seems nobody really *needs* that level of security...
The problem with that
