Re: [opensc-devel] Resources for getting started with ACOS5

2010-03-08 Thread Ian Young
On 5 Mar 2010, at 17:34, Greg Mefford wrote: It seems like the card software includes some Windows tools (which is fine with me if that's what it takes to get started) and a bunch of technical documentation, but not much practical help in how to actually use the thing. Right. As far as I

Re: [opensc-devel] Patches for ruToken ( opensc )

2008-01-04 Thread Ian Young
Martin Paljak wrote: On 03.01.2008, at 22:52, Ian Young wrote: Commited in revision 3310. Thanks Is there a file missing from that checkin? For me, revision 3309 builds (on Fedora 8) but 3310 and 3311 fail to build: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `pkcs15-prkey-rutoken.lo', needed

Re: [opensc-devel] Patches for ruToken ( opensc )

2008-01-04 Thread Ian Young
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: On Jan 3, 2008 9:52 PM, Ian Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a file missing from that checkin? For me, revision 3309 builds (on Fedora 8) but 3310 and 3311 fail to build: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `pkcs15-prkey-rutoken.lo', needed by `libopensc.la

[opensc-devel] newline in file name in opensc-explorer

2008-01-04 Thread Ian Young
I came across a case where a file name contained a newline (decimal 10, 0x0A) character, so that opensc-explorer broke the line when displaying it: OpenSC [3F00] ls FileID Type Size 0001iEF 0 0003iEF 0 2F00wEF 250 [4100]DF 0 Name: \xE8(\xBD\x08\x0F

Re: [opensc-devel] Patches for ruToken ( opensc )

2008-01-03 Thread Ian Young
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: On Dec 29, 2007 10:17 AM, Andrew V. Stepanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Thank you for pointing to my inaccuracies. In attachment patch for opensc. Commited in revision 3310. Thanks Is there a file missing from that checkin? For me, revision 3309 builds (on

[opensc-devel] ACS ACR38 reader?

2007-10-05 Thread Ian Young
There's some indication in these pages that the ACS ACR38 USB reader might be supported now or in the future, depending on what the page means by the next release (the page isn't dated). http://www.opensc-project.org/openct/wiki/pertosmart1038 Does anyone know what the actual situation is?

Re: [opensc-devel] ACOS5 cards implemented yet

2007-05-15 Thread Ian Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know, if the ACOS5 cards are implemented fully yet, since there are signs of it in the subversion-repository and an ACOS5 driver seems to exist already. The pkcs11-tool however seems not to work. Is there a workaround for this? The ACOS5 support that is

Re: [opensc-devel] ACOS5 progress

2007-03-13 Thread Ian Young
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: we prefer this style: indent -npro -kr -i8 -ts8 -sob -l80 -ss -ncs Thanks. I'll try and keep to that in future. I could either ident the file and commit it. or do you want to send an updated copy? I'd be happy for you to indent the file I already sent, unless

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3128] Add acos5 driver by Ian Young.

2007-03-13 Thread Ian Young
Martin Paljak wrote: On 13.03.2007, at 15:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +static struct sc_atr_table acos5_atrs[] = { +{3b:be:18:00:00:41:05:10:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:90:00, NULL, NULL, + SC_CARD_TYPE_TEST_BASE, 0, NULL}, This should definitely be something else than *_TEST_*

Re: [opensc-devel] ACOS5 progress

2007-03-12 Thread Ian Young
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: sounds great, please post your code for review. Here's what I have, as one attachment in svn diff format with the minor changes and one file card-acos5.c with the rest. I made sure the indentation on the minor changes matched the files that were being changed. The

[opensc-devel] ACOS5 progress

2007-03-11 Thread Ian Young
I made some progress a few weeks back on adding support for the ACS ACOS5 cards. My current status is that I have things working in opensc-tool and opensc-explorer, which is enough to be able to poke around inside the card, read and list files. I do have a couple of other things working, but it

Re: [opensc-devel] Re: ACOS5 cards

2007-02-19 Thread Ian Young
Gabriele Turchi wrote: I was able to do also some secure operation directly on the card (I must check my code), but I wasn't able to fully understand the structure of a card driver: there are so many cross references between different parts of the libraries... I've started working on this.

[opensc-devel] include processing in opensc sources

2007-02-19 Thread Ian Young
I ran into a problem recently when rebuilding opensc in an environment where a version of the package was already installed (Fedora Core 6, gcc 4.1.1, with both opensc and opensc-devel installed). The problem is that many of the opensc source files, but particularly opensc.h, include files like

Re: [opensc-devel] include processing in opensc sources

2007-02-19 Thread Ian Young
Ville Skyttä wrote: Wouldn't that be the rough equivalent of adding . to $PATH and/or $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, ie. what stuff gets actually used would depend on in which dir a command pulling it in would be run? Doesn't sound too good to me when thinking about these same headers being installed

Re: [opensc-devel] include processing in opensc sources

2007-02-19 Thread Ian Young
Ian Young wrote: From what you're saying, maybe the -I../../src/include option (either of them!) ought to be making the right thing happen, as that directory does include an opensc directory containing (soft links to) the appropriate files. Apparently not, though, and I don't know how

[opensc-devel] ACOS5 cards

2007-02-15 Thread Ian Young
There was a brief discussion a couple of months back about the ACS ACOS5 cards. Did anyone make any progress on this? The certificate management and PKCS#11 support that comes with these as part of the SDK is Windows-only. That's fine for my current project, but in the longer term it would be

[opensc-devel] Re: ACOS5 cards

2007-02-15 Thread Ian Young
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: I'd be willing to help as time permits, and I'm sure many other people here can answer questions about writing new card drivers too. So why don't you give it a try? take a look at a few drivers with full support (like cardos and cryptoflex and starcos), the basic