Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 09:39 , Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
>> Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>>
>>> I like the change with "struct foo" vs. "foo_t", but also I prefer
>>> variable names in function definitions. but I'm not sure if
>>> that results in problems, if people want to
On Mar 19, 2010, at 09:39 , Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>> I like the change with "struct foo" vs. "foo_t", but also I prefer
>> variable names in function definitions. but I'm not sure if
>> that results in problems, if people want to use different names.
>>
>> (no need to
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> I like the change with "struct foo" vs. "foo_t", but also I prefer
> variable names in function definitions. but I'm not sure if
> that results in problems, if people want to use different names.
>
> (no need to change, only meant as feedback...)
>
My intention was
I like the change with "struct foo" vs. "foo_t", but also I prefer
variable names in function definitions. but I'm not sure if
that results in problems, if people want to use different names.
(no need to change, only meant as feedback...)
Regards, Adreas
__