Peter Stuge wrote:
> You mentioned that one component is the small proprietary HID code
> for Linux and that part is of course not available, but it seemed
> like the other parts might be? Or did I misunderstand?
I think I did. I read your email again to check.
> Can you say more about the softw
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> > No need for token, but thanks for the offer! :) The code that already
> > supports the device is instead what I would look at. Is it available
> > online?
>
> Sorry, it is not publicly available.
You mentioned that one component is the small proprietary HID c
Le mardi 21 février 2012 à 00:44 +0100, Peter Stuge a écrit :
> No need for token, but thanks for the offer! :) The code that already
> supports the device is instead what I would look at. Is it available
> online?
Sorry, it is not publicly available.
I am confused about this discussion, because
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> > http://libusb.org/wiki/FAQ#CanIcreateadriverlessdeviceusingHIDclass
>
> I wron't discuss as I don't know if improving HID for GNU/Linux is
> really time consuming.
Hopefully you read the page anyway to find out about the
considerations for HID. It may still be
