Martin Paljak wrote:
* File versioning. Current .rc uses the libtool related version in the file
versioning which is not optimal. It has to my knowledge no relation to the
libtool interface versioning. Versions from OpenSC version and SVN revision
could be used instead. 0.12.1.5247 for
Le 04/04/2011 10:28, Martin Paljak a écrit :
On Apr 1, 2011, at 20:02 , Martin Paljak wrote:
* Installation location. The distributed DLL-s should IMO go to Windows
folder. The three files that should go to system32 or equivalent are:
* opensc.dll - does not pollute nor should it conflict
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:47 , Viktor TARASOV wrote:
Le 04/04/2011 10:28, Martin Paljak a écrit :
On Apr 1, 2011, at 20:02 , Martin Paljak wrote:
* Installation location. The distributed DLL-s should IMO go to Windows
folder. The three files that should go to system32 or equivalent are:
*
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:39 , Peter Stuge wrote:
Martin Paljak wrote:
* File versioning. Current .rc uses the libtool related version in the file
versioning which is not optimal. It has to my knowledge no relation to the
libtool interface versioning. Versions from OpenSC version and SVN
Martin Paljak wrote:
The way I understand it, opensc-pkcs11.dll (and other DLL-s)
resources should contain the version of the overall OpenSC package
for visual inspection, not what libtool thinks is the interface
level.
This is actually what libusb-1.0 does too.
//Peter
Hello,
On Mar 12, 2011, at 4:20 PM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
Revision: 5226
Author: vtarasov
Date: 2011-03-12 14:20:13 + (Sat, 12 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
msi: include 'cardmod.dll' and 'rutoken' PKCS#15 profiles into MSI
For easily repeatable builds and
Hello,
Le 21/03/2011 18:09, Martin Paljak a écrit :
On Mar 12, 2011, at 4:20 PM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
Revision: 5226
Author: vtarasov
Date: 2011-03-12 14:20:13 + (Sat, 12 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
msi: include 'cardmod.dll' and 'rutoken' PKCS#15 profiles
