Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-26 Thread JP Szikora
Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : > On 1/23/09, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote: > >> I compiled (on MacIntel) without problems this opensc and libp11 0.2.4. >> But engine 0.1.5 compilation fails: >> > > Do you use last released versions of engine_pkcs11 nor libp11? > Had it worked before? I remembered i

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 1/23/09, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > 2009/1/23 Alon Bar-Lev : > > > BTW: I asked in the past... Can you please try to see if the build [1] > > project can also be useful for you? I don't think we should maintain > > both... > > > > It is good also as none cross compile. > > > > [1] http://w

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/1/23 Alon Bar-Lev : > BTW: I asked in the past... Can you please try to see if the build [1] > project can also be useful for you? I don't think we should maintain > both... > > It is good also as none cross compile. > > [1] http://www.opensc-project.org/build I don't think mingw exists for M

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Freitag 23 Januar 2009 16:46:31 schrieb Jean-Pierre Szikora: > Undefined symbols: >"_PKCS11_CTX_init_args", referenced from: >_pkcs11_init in engine_pkcs11_la-engine_pkcs11.o > ld: symbol(s) not found > > Complete transcript in attachment. why the leading underscore? the symbol is i

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
BTW: I asked in the past... Can you please try to see if the build [1] project can also be useful for you? I don't think we should maintain both... It is good also as none cross compile. [1] http://www.opensc-project.org/build On 1/23/09, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 1/23/09, Jean-Pierre Szikora w

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 1/23/09, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote: > I compiled (on MacIntel) without problems this opensc and libp11 0.2.4. > But engine 0.1.5 compilation fails: Do you use last released versions of engine_pkcs11 nor libp11? Had it worked before? I remembered it was OK for you. Anyway... What I need is a

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 1/23/09, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Freitag 23 Januar 2009 14:48:23 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > > Works for me :) > > thanks for reporting! > > could you test the privdata fix? > if so, with which cards? Yes. Already reported... asepcos works OK, I even did not had to reinitialize the tok

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Freitag 23 Januar 2009 14:48:23 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > Works for me :) thanks for reporting! could you test the privdata fix? if so, with which cards? Thanks, Andreas ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.op

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Works for me :) On 1/23/09, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > here is a new snapshot with the latest code: > > http://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/snapshots/opensc-0.11.6-svn- > r3639.tar.gz > > please give it a try and let me know if it works, or what is wrong with it. > > > Thanks, Andrea

Re: [opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
here is a new snapshot with the latest code: http://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/snapshots/opensc-0.11.6-svn- r3639.tar.gz please give it a try and let me know if it works, or what is wrong with it. Thanks, Andreas ___ opensc-devel mailing list

[opensc-devel] does opensc (svn version) work for you?

2009-01-23 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Hi, does opensc in the current svn version still work for you? can you check if the privdata fix works for the cards you have? note: with older versions of opensc you can download private data with opensc-explorer without entering the pin, even though it was stored with the private maker. it woul