On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>>>
Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
>>>
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
extern CERTCertificate *
CERT_DecodeDERCertificate (SECItem *derSignedCert, PRBool copyDER, char
*nickna
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
>>
>> extern CERTCertificate *
>> CERT_DecodeDERCertificate (SECItem *derSignedCert, PRBool copyDER, char
>> *nickname);
>>
>
> Don't us
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
> reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
> cert1 == cert2
Commited in revision 354.
Thanks.
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
___
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Robert Relyea wrote:
When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
cert1 == cert2
Thanks, and what about d2i_X509() counterpart:
undefined symbol: d2i_X509 (.libs/ldap
Robert Relyea wrote:
>When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
> reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
>cert1 == cert2
Thanks, and what about d2i_X509() counterpart:
> > undefined symbol: d2i_X509 (.libs/ldap_mapper.so)
> >
> > So the libr
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
2008/10/24 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Fixed" in revision 353.
http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
Not yet completely. This seems to be critical
2008/10/24 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> 2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> "Fixed" in revision 353.
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
>
> Not yet completely. This seems to be critical:
Not really critical in fact :-)
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Fixed" in revision 353.
> http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
Not yet completely. This seems to be critical:
ldap_mapper.c: In function 'ldap_get_certificate':
ldap_mapper.c:760: warning: assignment
2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> > But I have two warnings:
>> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
>> > incompatible pointer type
>> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp'
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > But I have two warnings:
> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp' from
> > incompatible pointer type
>
> I spent a quite
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> But I have two warnings:
> ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
> incompatible pointer type
> ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp' from
> incompatible pointer type
I spent a quite a lot of time to identify this problem.
2008/10/15 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached two patches fix compilation errors or warnings when compiling
> with NSS support.
>
> Compiler messages are mentioned in patch headers.
Corrected in revision 347 and 348. Thanks
> Note that implicit declaration fix again refers to implic
Attached two patches fix compilation errors or warnings when compiling
with NSS support.
Compiler messages are mentioned in patch headers.
Note that implicit declaration fix again refers to implicit declaration
of function 'X509_cmp' problem, which may need x509.h, but location of
this header may
14 matches
Mail list logo
