On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>>>
Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
>>>
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
extern CERTCertificate *
CERT_DecodeDERCertificate (SECItem *derSignedCert, PRBool copyDER, char
*nickna
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Could it be implemented using CERT_DecodeDERCertificate()?
>>
>> extern CERTCertificate *
>> CERT_DecodeDERCertificate (SECItem *derSignedCert, PRBool copyDER, char
>> *nickname);
>>
>
> Don't us
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
> reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
> cert1 == cert2
Commited in revision 354.
Thanks.
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
___
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Robert Relyea wrote:
When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
cert1 == cert2
Thanks, and what about d2i_X509() counterpart:
undefined symbol: d2i_X509 (.libs/ldap
Robert Relyea wrote:
>When identical certs are imported into NSS, they are given the same
> reference counted pointer, so the test is as easy as:
>cert1 == cert2
Thanks, and what about d2i_X509() counterpart:
> > undefined symbol: d2i_X509 (.libs/ldap_mapper.so)
> >
> > So the libr
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
2008/10/24 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"Fixed" in revision 353.
http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
Not yet completely. This seems to be critical
2008/10/24 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> 2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> "Fixed" in revision 353.
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
>
> Not yet completely. This seems to be critical:
Not really critical in fact :-)
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Fixed" in revision 353.
> http://www.opensc-project.org/pam_pkcs11/changeset/353
Not yet completely. This seems to be critical:
ldap_mapper.c: In function 'ldap_get_certificate':
ldap_mapper.c:760: warning: assignment
2008/10/17 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> > But I have two warnings:
>> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
>> > incompatible pointer type
>> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp'
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > But I have two warnings:
> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp' from
> > incompatible pointer type
>
> I spent a quite
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> But I have two warnings:
> ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 1 of 'X509_cmp' from
> incompatible pointer type
> ldap_mapper.c:874: warning: passing argument 2 of 'X509_cmp' from
> incompatible pointer type
I spent a quite a lot of time to identify this problem.
2008/10/15 Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached two patches fix compilation errors or warnings when compiling
> with NSS support.
>
> Compiler messages are mentioned in patch headers.
Corrected in revision 347 and 348. Thanks
> Note that implicit declaration fix again refers to implic
13 matches
Mail list logo
