Thanks for the clarification, Meadhbh. And sorry, I also couldn't parse
the gender of your name :-)
In general, I have no problem with companies wanting to make standards
out of the things that they develop. However, we've only started to
scratch the surface on protocols for interoperability in
Sun's GPL'ed LookingGlass 3D desktop environment does have 3D in it so
there is some overlap, but I'm hoping for minimal confusion since
one's a world viewer and the other is a desktop and the audiences are
different.
Naming things is hard these days unless you want to use the name
"Xkwohlw". Oh w
a couple points...
a. it's ms. hamrick, not mr. hamrick. but don't worry... i get that a lot.
b. the purpose of the OGPX mailing list is to discuss requirements for
standardization as they exist today. with the expectation that we'll
eventually form a working group "soonish."
c. our plan is to t
Hi!
Toni Alatalo schrieb:
> On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Cristina Videira Lopes wrote:
>
>> Personally, I think this is all premature. IETF-ing the Hypergrid is
>> premature for different reasons than IETF-ing OGP is premature. The
>
> I think that depends on what is meant by IETF-ing. For propo
After 2 days of consideration and not hearing anything from the people
that I expected a response from, I came to the conclusion that it is
time to say "Goodbye"
This morning I released the 10 developers that were working on various
projects related to OpenSim and told them that I would see them a
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Cristina Videira Lopes wrote:
> Personally, I think this is all premature. IETF-ing the Hypergrid is
> premature for different reasons than IETF-ing OGP is premature. The
I think that depends on what is meant by IETF-ing. For proposing as a
standard, you are most pro
Is LookingGlass really a good name for a new 3D viewer? ;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Looking_Glass
Bye
f.d.g.
Mister Blue wrote:
> Over in the Forge is a new project: the LookingGlass viewer.
___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@list
>From your track record very well documented in this mailing list, I'd say you
>have good chances to get things done nicely here. Although I don't agree on
>all your opinions (read: OpenID, OAuth), sometimes someone has to implement
>things *when and *how she thinks it is right without political
I don't have as much concern that things are done using the IETF
process. That's IMO the appropriate place for some of the work given in
some cases they're extending protocols already specified via IETF RFC's.
Since OGP and hypergrid really sort of imply collaboration between
multiple providers do
I agree on getting it working first. I also consider OGP and HG2
mutually exclusive and don't foresee a region wanting to have both.
Melanie
Cristina Videira Lopes wrote:
> Inifinity sent me a very nice private message, which, because it was
> private, I'm not going to forward here. But the b
As far as HyperGrid and when it is ready for prime time I do not think there
is anyone who could speak to that better than Cristina.
Kyle
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Cristina Videira
Lopes
Sent
Inifinity sent me a very nice private message, which, because it was
private, I'm not going to forward here. But the bottom line of his
nice message could use some public discussion. Essentially Infinity
is suggesting that we move towards getting the Hypergrid work into
the IETF, through th
Hi,
I have to agree with Melanie.
This is not about being selfish, it's about who you see as the user. Let's say
you have a bug that fills your database slowly but surely, then the user and
grid operator Charles K. (name abbreviated to protect the innocent) is very
much influenced, but the en
Well, it's not really that hard, just don't do it in a selfish way..
Put yourself in the users' shoes..
~Tom.
Melanie wrote:
> "Severity" is a malleable term. To me, a bug that will cause me to
> lose appearance on teleports would be _much_ more severe than one
> that eats SQLite tables.
>
> B
I concur with Melanie.
In general, the issue with Mantis is that those things which are in the
interest sphere of various core developers and patch submitters will be the
ones that are fixed.
So, our strategy is more finding, diagnosing and confirming repeatable
failures, as a minimum. Beyond
"Severity" is a malleable term. To me, a bug that will cause me to
lose appearance on teleports would be _much_ more severe than one
that eats SQLite tables.
Because I _do_ care about my avatar's appearance, but _don't_ use
SQLite.
So, I would think it's really hard to find an objective way of
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dan wrote:
> Due to the large number of Mantis reports, how about prioritizing them
> according to their importance, and focus on all Mantis reports related to
> the most critical issues first.
>
how about this when we rank the bugs do two different sets of points
Incredible work!
Microsoft Case Study on ReactionGrid
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Mister Blue
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:15 PM
To: opensim-dev
Subject: [Opensim-dev] LookingGlass viewe
Over in the Forge is a new project: the LookingGlass viewer. What
started out as a small project to learn C# turned into a whole virtual
world viewer framework. It is no where near usable for normal viewing
(lacking avatars and navigation and many features) but it will connect
to OpenSim and render
Due to the large number of Mantis reports, how about prioritizing them
according to their importance, and focus on all Mantis reports related to
the most critical issues first.
For example start with any issues dealing with OAR backups since no matter
what happens to a grid, as long as a region ow
Hi,
thanks for your reply. I know, that this is the opensim developer list, and
because of the fact that I'm developing for opensim and many opensim user
use the realxtend client I thought it would be a good idea to ask here
first.
It's a pity that the current rex viewer is based on a very old ve
Daniel
For that the answer is modrex, not RX. In the RX mail list we can give you
more info.
2009/6/3 Melanie
> Hi,
>
> the RealExtend viewer of the current generation is based on a very
> old version of the SecondLife client, while SL and hippo are current
> versions. These functions can not b
Hi,
the RealExtend viewer of the current generation is based on a very
old version of the SecondLife client, while SL and hippo are current
versions. These functions can not be made to work with the current
RealExtend client. Also, this is not the RealExtend list. They have
a mailinglist as we
Isnt Realxtend based on a older LL viewer?? these functions are probably
just not available on the source tree they chose, I even recall that
windlight is not even supported on this viewer, so its probably quite old in
comparsion to hippo and LL's current release.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 AM,
Hi all,
as reported on
http://www.mail-archive.com/realxt...@googlegroups.com/msg00820.html, there
are still some LL functions the realxtend viewer doesn't support so far. I
need in particular the function "llDetectedTouchUV(int index)" to determine
the mouse coordinates on a surface of a textu
Thanks a lot for your hints. The idea with the "anonymous mode" sounds nice.
We will have a deeper look at this issue and try to find a solution. If it
is usable, we will share it with you ;).
Greetings
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Destiny Niles [mailto:techieda...@gmail.com]
As requested I made my patch compatible with the trunk code and I
submitted it yesterday.
Could someone look at this (ID 0003746), please?
robert_d
___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensi
27 matches
Mail list logo
