Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:50:43PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
I can envision a time when we might want to update it to recognize
more
device types. If we were to
> I've restarted the timer on this fast-track case; it's now set to
> 09/14/2007.
Sigh. I'm getting quite frustrated with this review. Somehow
when I believed the project team and case owner understood the
issues, I thought I'd see that more clearly reflected in the
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:50:43PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:12:18PM -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>> I can envision a time when we might want to update it to recognize more
>>> device types. If we were to break this down to device-type and met
In which document do you see the symlinks removed ?
--Stefan
-
Jyri Virkki wrote:
> Turns out there are some inconsistencies in the file layout between
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/168/materials/php5filestructure-txt/
> and the main specification,
> http://www.
Chris Gerhard wrote:
> HOME and SHELL are also being used in their expected ways and again it
> would be strange to not propagate those in the environment of the cron
> job having acted on them.
Plus I thought the whole point of this case was to ensure that they did
get used both for cron AND
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> I'm sponsoring this OpenSolaris case for Chris Gerhard. It has some possible
>> standards impact but I believe based on previous discussions this should
>> be acceptable, if it wasn't for the standards impact this would likely have
>> been self-review
