This is great! FYI, The existing ImageMagick package could also be
linked against LCMS.
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:24 PM, John Fischer wrote:
> PSARC,
>
> I am sponsoring this fast track for Stefan Teleman from the SFW group.
> The case materials contain this proposal. I have set the timeout for
>
On Jan 31, 2008 8:34 PM, Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Petr Sumbera wrote:
> >> I ask because the "tomcat55" path name seems odd to me. I would have
> >> expected "tomcat5" here ... and dealing with a path that changes again
> >> in the future would probably be annoying.
> >
> > I have no problem with
I am sponsoring this fast track for the CIFS client team.
This fast track proposes to update the original case,
PSARC/2005/695. The amendments are outlined below.
The complete version of the updated materials can be found
in the materials directory for the case. The timeout is
set for one week f
achment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080131/9c2bd3da/attachment.bin>
James Carlson wrote:
> Joseph Kowalski writes:
>> Update to Apache Tomcat 4.1 which is still being sporadically supported
>> for security problems or to community fully supported version 5.5 (which
>> is now in Nevada) would require users to recompile their application and
>> possibly deal with sev
ed...
Name: proposal.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080131/b4ad9b62/attachment.txt>
implements the
International Color Consortium's ICC.1:2004-10 Specification.
Thanks,
John
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: proposal.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080131/
Mark Martin writes:
> I noticed during yesterday's conference call that a number of
> fast-tracks were covered which weren't on the agenda, was this just an
> oversight for the agenda?
The ones I covered were the outstanding fast-tracks as of 4:44AM PST
Wednesday morning, and as reported by sac_as
> > As a future possible applicant for internship, I'm
> > wondering if having access to those materials or tools will be
> > necessary or if every thing I may need is going to be available in the
> > forums and on OSo. I'm still trying to identify all of the
> > responsibilities of such internsh
The issues file is part of each case materials, assuming
that the various reviewers put their comments in the file,
that the nightly os.o mirroring scripts work, and that the
case is correctly marked for open exposure.
We are beginning the (probably huge) effort to create
tools that will work on O
James Carlson wrote:
> ...
>> Some other questions
>> What is the rights profile for bridging?
>>
>
> No new rights profile or change to existing profiles is needed. The
> existing "Network Link Security" and "Network Management" rights
> profiles include dladm with sufficient privilege (
I noticed during yesterday's conference call that a number of
fast-tracks were covered which weren't on the agenda, was this just an
oversight for the agenda?
As well, the materials for 2007/425 "Wireless USB support" don't seem
to be available via OSo.
On a more general note, it occurs to me tha
Glenn Faden wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
>> Jarrett Lu writes:
>>
>>> So far, I don't see a cliff yet. Ed's concern is mostly about not
>>> cleaning up
>>> default routes after zones are halted. While I think Ed has a point,
>>> I don't
>>> see zones not cleaning up their default routes upon h
James Carlson wrote:
> Jarrett Lu writes:
>
>> So far, I don't see a cliff yet. Ed's concern is mostly about not
>> cleaning up
>> default routes after zones are halted. While I think Ed has a point, I don't
>> see zones not cleaning up their default routes upon halting as a disaster.
>> We alr
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:59:45PM -0800, John Fischer wrote:
> 4.5. Interfaces:
>
> Exported Interfaces
> Interface ClassificationComments
> --- ------
> SQLite3 CLI
Petr Sumbera writes:
> Tomcat is community software and we cannot be 100% sure. But it seems
> that move from 4.0->4.1 was rather unusual (they changed even a name
> (Jakarta/Apache):
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users at tomcat.apache.org/msg37336.html
OK, that's what I was expecting here.
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> Just the
> version of SQLite 3.x from whose documentation the stabilities will be
> derived and the algorithm ...
>
> I'm not an ARC member. Will an ARC member make this request on my
> behalf?
Done - what he said :-)
-John
I am sponsoring this fast track for Strony Zhang.
Requested binding is minor, timeout 02/07/2008.
-Artem
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.64 07/13/07 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
Additional USB Devic
Petr Sumbera wrote:
>> I ask because the "tomcat55" path name seems odd to me. I would have
>> expected "tomcat5" here ... and dealing with a path that changes again
>> in the future would probably be annoying.
>
> I have no problem with changing of the path. But from information we
> have we can
ue
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080131/48a60f34/attachment.ksh>
Petr Sumbera wrote:
> Tomcat is started (beside manually) via Apache 1.3 init script
What about Apache 2.x - how does this work with that version?
-John
Joseph Kowalski writes:
> Update to Apache Tomcat 4.1 which is still being sporadically supported
> for security problems or to community fully supported version 5.5 (which
> is now in Nevada) would require users to recompile their application and
> possibly deal with several other incompatibilitie
Jarrett Lu writes:
> So far, I don't see a cliff yet. Ed's concern is mostly about not
> cleaning up
> default routes after zones are halted. While I think Ed has a point, I don't
> see zones not cleaning up their default routes upon halting as a disaster.
> We already have situations that default
David.Comay at Sun.COM writes:
> > James explained that this is not quite so. I think we would need a
> > manpage for libsqlite with a URL to the actual docs, and a list of
> > interface stabilities for the various functions ("these are
> > Uncommitted," "these are Obsolete Volatile" and "the rest
James Carlson wrote:
> Jarrett Lu writes:
>
>> So far, I don't see a cliff yet. Ed's concern is mostly about not
>> cleaning up
>> default routes after zones are halted. While I think Ed has a point, I don't
>> see zones not cleaning up their default routes upon halting as a disaster.
>> We alr
Approved in PSARC Meeting on January 30.
alan.
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> The idea is that it will be treated completely seperately to this case
> and 2008/011 will not be able to proceed without it.
>
> alan.
>
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Alan Hargreaves wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what happened to
26 matches
Mail list logo