Closed as approved.
--Irene
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:56 +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
If there's objections within 24 hours, I'd like to close this case as
approved then.
Thanks
--irene
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 15:47 +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
Hi, All
I am reseting the timeout to be
Closed as approved.
--Irene
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:50 +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
Within 24 hours, if there's no objections, I'll close this case as
approved.
--Irene
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:02 +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
Hi, all
The updated proposal is posted at
Internally
Hi, Jim
Please make a decision on how to handle the property ASAP, and then I
think we can put an end to this case:)
Thanks
--Irene
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 10:35 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Jim Li wrote:
Darren J Moffat ??:
Jim Li wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
So what is the
://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080805/f763f3a0/attachment.txt
completeness question: who's the intended consumer for this event?
Kais
Sebastien Roy wrote:
I'm submitting this case for Cathy Zhou. It is being filed as closed
approved automatic.
???Datalink sysevents
--
release binding: patch
Summary
---
This case
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
goffice for OpenSolaris
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Halton Huo
1.3 Date of This
Hi all
Additional materials, including manpages and pkgmaps are posted at
Internally
http://sac.eng/Archives/CaseLog/arc/LSARC/2008/501/materials/
Externally
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2008/501
Please review
--Irene
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 02:42 -0700, Shi-Ying Irene
The major motivation for using SMF for the configuration was to easily
support multiple instances.
For the man page that is delivered please include some multiinstance
examples eg:
svc://network/pen:http
svc://network/pen:ftp
The case doesn't need to be updated with this
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Daniel Hain wrote:
I've been informed that the project team has an Aug 6 deadline for
providing EOF materials to Marketing and Docs, pending resolution of
this case (timeout on 8/4). I would like to summarize where I think
we are so that the project team can
Daniel Hain wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Daniel Hain wrote:
I've been informed that the project team has an Aug 6 deadline for
providing EOF materials to Marketing and Docs, pending resolution of
this case (timeout on 8/4). I would like to summarize where I
think we are so that the
This event will be consumed by a syseventd module which in turn will
generate a RCM event which will then be consumed by the RCM modules.
But the usage of the EC_DATALINK class would not be limited to this.
- Cathy
completeness question: who's the intended consumer for this event?
Kais
RCM is normally (historically, anyway) used for device *removal*,
rather than addition.
What do you intend the RCM module to do with this event?
-- Garrett
Cathy Zhou wrote:
This event will be consumed by a syseventd module which in turn will
generate a RCM event which will then be
RCM is also used to restore all the configuration when the device is
plugged back in and that is when this sysevent will be used.
- Cathy
RCM is normally (historically, anyway) used for device *removal*,
rather than addition.
What do you intend the RCM module to do with this event?
Thanks for the clarification.
(I wasn't aware that RCM was being used this way. I recall that once
upon a time there was a separate sysevent architecture where insertion
events were handled without RCM interposing. The point, at the time, of
having a separate RCM from sysevent was that RCM
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
rpc.kstatd: Remote Kstat Access Service
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Nicolas Williams
1.3
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.
ditto.
Kais
(I wasn't aware that RCM was being used this way. I recall that once
upon a time there was a separate sysevent architecture where
insertion events were handled without RCM interposing. The point, at
the time, of
Henry Zhang wrote:
Below is the proposal, I added the libOpenSSL into interface list, and
the contract is ongoing
4.5. Interfaces:
Imported Interfaces
Interface StabilityComments
--- ---
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:08:04PM -0700, John Plocher wrote:
Henry Zhang wrote:
Below is the proposal, I added the libOpenSSL into interface list, and
the contract is ongoing
4.5. Interfaces:
Imported Interfaces
Interface StabilityComments
18 matches
Mail list logo
