Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > I've seen mail from David Korn (not CC'd to PSARC, unfortunately)
> > which I think cleared this up unambiguously. Check the "no" box, and
> > lets move forward. :-)
> Can we forward this to PSARC (actually the case, so it is captured)?
>
> The
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> John Plocher wrote:
> > I think it is time for an updated spec/issue roll up.
> >
> > Here is where I think things stand - please correct any
> > misunderstandings:
[snip]
> > 2) Relationship of "t-, t, t+" versioning scheme and C-Team
> > integration rules.
> >
> >
John Plocher wrote:
> Chris Pickett wrote:
> >> Last but not least what is a shell ? would /usr/lib/shell/python be
> >> allowed ?
> >
> > Don't. Be. Silly.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_shell
> >
> > Unless python starts calling itself a shell it isn't one.
>
> What "libraries written i
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
>> 2) Relationship of "t-, t, t+" versioning scheme and C-Team
>> integration rules.
>> ...
>> Resolution:
>> Not a problem.
> I can't seem to get a clear answer about my concern (and yes, it
> is a C-team issue). Let me try a very simple question:
>
>C
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> HOWEVER, I recognize that this is Volatile, subject to change, and I
> won't press too heavily for the above details.
I think this last bit is where Roland (et.al.) want to play test ideas
simply because they don't have a spec in mind right now...
I personally don't beli
John Plocher wrote:
> I think it is time for an updated spec/issue roll up.
>
> Here is where I think things stand - please correct any
> misunderstandings:
>
> This project is an amendment to the Korn Shell 93 Integration project
> update 1 ARC case (PSARC/2008/094) specifying the following addit
I think it is time for an updated spec/issue roll up.
Here is where I think things stand - please correct any misunderstandings:
This project is an amendment to the Korn Shell 93 Integration project
update 1 ARC case (PSARC/2008/094) specifying the following additional
interfaces:
1) Update o
From David Korn, as referenced by Garrett, forwarded by Roland.
> I expect that the new features are subject to change
> based on feedback (bugs and ideas). Once there has
> been enough feedback that I feel comfortable I remove the -
> suffix.
That sounds like a resoundin
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> I've seen mail from David Korn (not CC'd to PSARC, unfortunately)
> which I think cleared this up unambiguously. Check the "no" box, and
> lets move forward. :-)
Can we forward this to PSARC (actually the case, so it is captured)?
Then we can truly move forward
-
John Plocher wrote:
> 1) Introduction of hexfloat, enum and ceil into reserved namespace
> ...
> Resolution:
> Not a problem.
Agreed.
> 2) Relationship of "t-, t, t+" versioning scheme and C-Team
> integration rules.
> ...
> Resolution:
> Not a problem.
I can't seem to ge
Roland Mainz wrote:
>
>
> Why is this /usr/lib/shell/ directory _that_ difficult_ to get via
> ARC ? Somehow I'm starting to regret to have exposed too much detail and
> now we're _bickering_ (sorry for that word but I don't know any better
> word for it) the details down to a sub-atomic level to h
11 matches
Mail list logo
