Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of the
ksh93-integration project.
Please note that this is an *open* case.
[snip]
As discussed in today's ARC phone call...
... attached is the updated text for onepager.txt and
manpage.diff.txt and the diff from the
Roland Mainz wrote:
As discussed in today's ARC phone call...
... attached is the updated text for onepager.txt and
manpage.diff.txt and the diff from the old to the new version
(ksh93_integration_update1_Amendments_1_PSARC_2008_344_case_update001.diff.txt)
Thank you Roland. I have archived
James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com wrote:
Darren J Moffat writes:
While it is ksh93 I don't think any of this really matters that much
because you have to explicitly ask for ksh93. On the other hand if this
same implementation was exporting this same functionality by default
Darren J Moffat writes:
While it is ksh93 I don't think any of this really matters that much
because you have to explicitly ask for ksh93. On the other hand if this
same implementation was exporting this same functionality by default
when it was used as the implementation of /bin/sh I
I. Szczesniak wrote:
Such as __sun_ksh_93__.2008.05.28__namespace__.LONG DESCRIPTION.enum?
No, such as set ksh_language_level=93s or something - it's not our place
to design here, just ask if it's been considered. Hopefully Glenn or David
can tell us how this is handled in general,
