Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Erm... two items:
> > 1. B72 integrated ksh93 version "s-" (which was an "alpha" version, too)
> > - and for the first attempt it was AFAIK quite good. And the upcoming
> > ksh93t- will be "better" since we learned from our mistakes.
> > 2. Looking a
Glenn Skinner wrote:
[snip]
> > ## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
> > The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from
> > ast-ksh.2007-12-15 to ast-ksh-2008-05-22 which marks the update
> > from ksh93 version 's+' to version 't-' (AST/ksh93 uses the
> > (latin) alphabet for its version numbe
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > It may be helpful for persons observing this, as well as the project
> > team, to understand that Solaris integrations always need to conform to
> > a "release ready" rule. That is, we don't integrate software that
> > aren't comfortable includi
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
> > Glenn Skinner wrote:
[snip
> > If the project team wishes to retain the existing stability
> > classification, that's their prerogative; they'll have chosen to
> > assume the risk of violating the stability classification's guarantees
> > (and presuma
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> >> Glenn Skinner wrote:
[snip]
> >> I read it as "we don't integrate '-' versions into Solaris". Did I
> >> guess right?
> >>
> >
> > Grumpf... IMO it depends what the '-' means - see
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermai
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
[snip]
> > ## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
> > The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from
> > ast-ksh.2007-12-15 to ast-ksh-2008-05-22 which marks the update
> > from ksh93 version 's+' to version 't-' (AST/ksh93 uses the
>
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Alan Coopersmith
> > Subject: ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1 [PSARC/2008/344
> > FastTrack timeout 06/03/2008]
> >
> > ...
> > ##
John Plocher wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
> > (latin) alphabet for its version number, e.g. version 'a',
> > version 'b' etc. ; the '+'/'-' means the stabilty status, e.g.
> > '-' means its "alpha", no suffix means its "stable" (e.g. ready
> > for production usage) and '+' means
This has gotten way off the track of architectural review, so I have moved
psarc-ext to the blind copy list.
Garrett> ... Solaris integrations always need to conform to a "release ready"
Garrett> rule. That is, we don't integrate software that aren't comfortable
Garrett> including in a full rele
Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> Erm... two items:
> 1. B72 integrated ksh93 version "s-" (which was an "alpha" version, too)
> - and for the first attempt it was AFAIK quite good. And the upcoming
> ksh93t- will be "better" since we learned from our mistakes.
> 2. Looking at the number of bugs open in bugs
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> It may be helpful for persons observing this, as well as the project
> team, to understand that Solaris integrations always need to conform to
> a "release ready" rule. That is, we don't integrate software that
> aren't comfortable including in a full release, as that soft
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>> Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>>
>>> Glenn Skinner wrote:
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from
ast-ksh.2007-12-15 to ast-ksh-2008-05-22 which marks the u
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 21:45:12 +0200
From: Roland Mainz
Subject: Re: 2008/344 [ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1]
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: A
Roland Mainz wrote:
> No, the '+'/''/'-' stuff refers to the upstream version we're using, not
> the ARC stabilty level (and see my other email about the tests we use to
> gurantee that the "alpha" version of ksh93 is stable enougth for
> production usage).
>
Could you provide the definition/spe
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 07:39:03 -1000
From: Joseph Kowalski
Subject: Re: 2008/344 [ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1]
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Alan Coopersmith
> Subject: ksh93 Integration
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
>> Glenn Skinner wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>
>>> ## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
>>> The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from
>>> ast-ksh.2007-12-15 to ast-ksh-2008-05-22 which marks the update
>>> from ksh93 version
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> (latin) alphabet for its version number, e.g. version 'a',
> version 'b' etc. ; the '+'/'-' means the stabilty status, e.g.
> '-' means its "alpha", no suffix means its "stable" (e.g. ready
> for production usage) and '+' means its a bugfixed stable version
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alan Coopersmith
Subject: ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1 [PSARC/2008/344
FastTrack timeout 06/03/2008]
...
## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from
as
John Plocher wrote:
> Glenn Skinner wrote:
>> (latin) alphabet for its version number, e.g. version 'a',
>> version 'b' etc. ; the '+'/'-' means the stabilty status, e.g.
>> '-' means its "alpha", no suffix means its "stable" (e.g. ready
>> for production usage) and '+' means its
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Alan Coopersmith
> Subject: ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1 [PSARC/2008/344
> FastTrack timeout 06/03/2008]
>
> ...
> ## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93
> The 1.1 portion of this project
20 matches
Mail list logo
