me,
>> let's find a time to schedule it rather than for me to have
>> direct non-arc email get queued for when I get back to it.
>>
>>
>>> > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:20:16 +0800
>>> > From: xiao li - Sun Microsystems - Beijing Chin
;
>>>
>>> Are these legitimate questions in the committe's view?
>>> Does the project team have more to specify?
>>> Unbelievable as it may be, I can just shut up ;-)
>>>
>>> Case owner,
>>> If you and the projec
On 11/12/08 09:59, Gary Winiger wrote:
> David,
>
>
>> Add Xiao.l into this loop.
>>
>
> Are you saying that the Interest: list in the IAM file isn't
> working? If so, please have the case owner fix it, or if
> interest list processing is failing all together, the case
>
s find a time to schedule it rather than for me to have
> direct non-arc email get queued for when I get back to it.
>
>
>> > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:20:16 +0800
>> > From: xiao li - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
>> > Subject: Re: Sg3 utilitie
IAM file has been corrected.
-- mark
David Zhang wrote:
> On 11/12/08 09:59, Gary Winiger wrote:
>> David,
>>
>>
>>> Add Xiao.l into this loop.
>>>
>>
>> Are you saying that the Interest: list in the IAM file isn't
>> working? If so, please have the case owner fix it, or if
>>
David,
> Add Xiao.l into this loop.
Are you saying that the Interest: list in the IAM file isn't
working? If so, please have the case owner fix it, or if
interest list processing is failing all together, the case
owner needs to let SAC staff know so it can be reso
shut up?
>
> Gary..
>
Gary,
Was Xiao's answer of 11/06/2008 sufficient?
> (message trimmed)
> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:20:16 +0800
> From: xiao li - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
> Subject: Re: Sg3 utilities 1.25 [PSARC/2008/683 Self Review]
>
> I di
wner,
If you and the project need some consulting time with me,
let's find a time to schedule it rather than for me to have
direct non-arc email get queued for when I get back to it.
> > Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:20:16 +0800
> > From: xiao li - Sun Microsys
> > > Do all these commands require privilege to run ? If so which privileges
> > > ? Is there an RBAC profile for them ?
> > >
> > I'm not familiar with RBAC, so let me try to answer your questions.
>
> Ah, a learning opportunity ;-) I guess time to brush up
> on this significa
Please see my comments below.
Gary Winiger wrote:
>>> Do all these commands require privilege to run ? If so which privileges
>>> ? Is there an RBAC profile for them ?
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not familiar with RBAC, so let me try to answer your questions.
>>
>
> Ah, a learning oppor
Please see my comments below.
Gary Winiger wrote:
>> This case - Sg3 utilities 1.25 - has been moved here to PSARC from LSARC.
>>
>> Please direct email conversations to this list going forward.
>>
>
> And do you believe it still stands as self review?
> There seem to be actual qu
> > Do all these commands require privilege to run ? If so which privileges
> > ? Is there an RBAC profile for them ?
> >
> I'm not familiar with RBAC, so let me try to answer your questions.
Ah, a learning opportunity ;-) I guess time to brush up
on this significant featur
> This case - Sg3 utilities 1.25 - has been moved here to PSARC from LSARC.
>
> Please direct email conversations to this list going forward.
And do you believe it still stands as self review?
There seem to be actual questions that are architectural
not answered in the spe
This case - Sg3 utilities 1.25 - has been moved here to PSARC from LSARC.
Please direct email conversations to this list going forward.
Thanks,
-- mark
14 matches
Mail list logo
