dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-30 Thread Irene Huang
closed approved. --Irene On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 19:18 +0800, Irene Huang wrote: Hi, all I've changed the interface definition in http://sac.eng/Archives/CaseLog/arc/LSARC/2008/446/proposal-v2.txt There's no more unresolved issues for this case, I'd like to close it in 24 hours if

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-28 Thread Jim Li
Brian: If these interfaces are intended for Solaris users to make use of, then should the interfaces be Uncommitted rather than Volatile? It doesn't seem much good to provide interfaces for providing dialogs via shell scripts if the interfaces might change or break. As matter of fact,

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-28 Thread Irene Huang
Hi, all I've changed the interface definition in http://sac.eng/Archives/CaseLog/arc/LSARC/2008/446/proposal-v2.txt There's no more unresolved issues for this case, I'd like to close it in 24 hours if there's no more questions. --Irene On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 18:26 +0800, Jim Li wrote: Brian:

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-25 Thread Jim Li
Brian: If these interfaces are intended for Solaris users to make use of, then should the interfaces be Uncommitted rather than Volatile? It doesn't seem much good to provide interfaces for providing dialogs via shell scripts if the interfaces might change or break. As matter of fact,

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-25 Thread Brian Cameron
Jim: If these interfaces are intended for Solaris users to make use of, then should the interfaces be Uncommitted rather than Volatile? It doesn't seem much good to provide interfaces for providing dialogs via shell scripts if the interfaces might change or break. As matter of fact,

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-24 Thread Brian Cameron
Jim: Reading these materials, it wasn't initially clear to me how this project is different than zenity (which allows you to display GTK+ dialogs from shell scripts). After checking the dialog website, I found that it is used for displaying curses (or text-based) widgets. So that is how it

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-23 Thread Irene Huang
Hi, All I am extending the timeout to be this Friday. Jim would you please answer the questions from Brian? Thanks --Irene Brian Cameron wrote: Reading these materials, it wasn't initially clear to me how this project is different than zenity (which allows you to display GTK+ dialogs from

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-23 Thread Jim Li
Brian, Reading these materials, it wasn't initially clear to me how this project is different than zenity (which allows you to display GTK+ dialogs from shell scripts). After checking the dialog website, I found that it is used for displaying curses (or text-based) widgets. So that is how it

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-21 Thread Irene Huang
Hi, all If there's any issues with this case, please send an email before timeout, or I'll close this case as approved. Thanks --Irene On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:20 -0700, Shi-Ying Irene Huang wrote: Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI This information is Copyright 2008 Sun

dialog for OpenSolaris [LSARC/2008/446 FastTrack timeout 07/22/2008]

2008-07-15 Thread Shi-Ying Irene Huang
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: dialog for OpenSolaris 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Jim Li 1.3 Date of This Document: