This case was approved on 02/20/2008.
I understand that a faint Yippiiee could be heard from the background
of the phone call ...
- jek3
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
## Part 1.8: Enable default prompt (PS1) for interactive shells
The 1.8 portion of this project specifies to define a default prompt
(PS1) in /etc/ksh.kshrc for interactive ksh93 shell sessions to
improve end-user usabilty if the user did
John Plocher wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Plocher/jek3:
Is there a way to get the CC: thing fixed for an ARC case which is
already running ?
Done. All mail sent to PSARC-ext@ from now on will automatically
be Bcc'd to ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org (unless, of
course, the
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
Part 5: Enhancement of /usr/bin/sum
The 5th part of this project specifies an enhancement to
/usr/bin/sum and a new ksh93 built-in with the same name based on
the ATT AST sum command. The ATT version of the sum utility
provides
Roland Mainz wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
I had access to a T2000 machine and several Ultra40+45 machines (thanks
to Jesse Silver) at the OpenSolaris Summit 2007 and did some
benchmarking. It seems that the code for the sum builtin (e.g. calling
sum has
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
Part 5: Enhancement of /usr/bin/sum
The 5th part of this project specifies an enhancement to
/usr/bin/sum and a new ksh93 built-in with the same name based on
the ATT AST sum command. The ATT version of the sum utility
provides
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Please use libmd(3lib) unless there is a very compelling reason not to
do so - if there I would like to see that documented here.
There is no compelling reason, however I would prefer to defer this to
the putback following the one we've
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
The short answer is No. This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration
works.
You did see the comment that I said ... yes, we will do it... ?
Yes I did.
We don't integrate what is determined to be the less optional
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:55:25 +0100 Roland Mainz wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
The short answer is No. This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration works.
You did see the comment that I said ... yes, we will do it... ?
We could probably accept a modified proposal that
I added and tested a 300 line ast sum(3) wrapper for the solaris -lmd
hash/digest functions
sum(3) is a discipline/method library used by the ast sum(1), cksum(1)
and *sum(1) command links that are implemented in the ast cmd(3) library
advantages to using the sum(3) api:
(1) to change the
Glenn Fowler wrote:
I added and tested a 300 line ast sum(3) wrapper for the solaris -lmd
hash/digest functions
sum(3) is a discipline/method library used by the ast sum(1), cksum(1)
and *sum(1) command links that are implemented in the ast cmd(3) library
advantages to using the sum(3)
James C. McPherson wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.64 07/13/07 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
ksh93 Update 1
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of XXX.
XXX. Hmm. Now is that the father of , or did you
actually mean to specify Roland?
Sigh,... third person to note this, all with a somewhat different pun.
Plocher! I need to
[Repost with jek3 at train1.eng.sun.com (seems to be unreachable outside
Sun) replaced with Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com]
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of XXX.
XXX. Hmm. Now is that the father of , or did you
Roland Mainz wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of XXX.
XXX. Hmm. Now is that the father of , or did you
actually mean to specify Roland?
Sigh,... third person to note this, all with a
Roland Mainz wrote:
Slightly offtopic: Are these tools opensource ? :-)
They could easily be, but they have several downsides:
o they need to run internal to Sun's firewall,
o they presume NFS access, a shared netgroup, and access to emacs and vi,
o they are a 15 year old collection of
Roland Mainz wrote:
Something should be done with 2007/233 to reflect this.
Erm... yes... originally I thought the cases were closed until Don
reminded me that they're still half-alive and twitching... does anyone
know what needs to be done in this case (e.g. add a comment which says
Roland Mainz wrote:
Please use libmd(3lib) unless there is a very compelling reason not to
do so - if there I would like to see that documented here.
There is no compelling reason, however I would prefer to defer this to
the putback following the one we've prepared for this ARC case. We
Roland Mainz wrote:
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
The short answer is No. This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration works.
You did see the comment that I said ... yes, we will do it... ?
Yes I did.
We don't integrate what is determined to be the less optional
architecture with a
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
## Part 1.8: Enable default prompt (PS1) for interactive shells
The 1.8 portion of this project specifies to define a default prompt
(PS1) in /etc/ksh.kshrc for interactive ksh93 shell sessions to
improve end-user usabilty if the user did not specify a value for PS1
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.64 07/13/07 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
ksh93 Update 1
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Roland Mainz
1.3
James C. McPherson wrote:
I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of XXX.
XXX. Hmm. Now is that the father of , or did you
actually mean to specify Roland?
Sigh,... third person to note this, all with a somewhat different pun.
Plocher! I need to talk to you about your tools!
22 matches
Mail list logo
