On 30.03.10 06:54, Dan Price wrote:
On Mon 29 Mar 2010 at 11:14AM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
On 03/29/10 11:01, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
How do commands like ls and find handle printing of filenames with
arbitrary characters (newlines and such)?
In general, badly.
Tim,
My concern, which others h
Hi,
I'm wondering, will zfs diff work between two zfs pools?
I want to know if the current snapshot of my data differs from the
snapshot I created by "zfs send | zfs receive" while ago (on the same
machine, just different pool), so that I should refresh my backup.
Does 'zfs diff' read all the da
On 3/30/10 5:35 AM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering, will zfs diff work between two zfs pools?
No. Only between snapshots within the same dataset within the same pool.
I want to know if the current snapshot of my data differs from the
snapshot I created by "zfs send | zfs receive
Dan,
I have to +1 all of your well-thought-out comments. As a potential
consuming of this functionality for the Immutable Service Container
project, answers to these questions are critical.
I am also interested in whether additional fields can be added to
the output similar to a "-o field1,fie
On 03/30/10 09:58, Glenn Brunette wrote:
Dan,
I have to +1 all of your well-thought-out comments. As a potential
consuming of this functionality for the Immutable Service Container
project, answers to these questions are critical.
I am also interested in whether additional fields can be added
On Tue 30 Mar 2010 at 01:20AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > 1) In what order are the changes printed? If I saw:
> >
> > + /myfiles/rename_dir
> > R /myfiles/rename_dir -> /myfiles/rename_dir
> >
> > My analyzer would need to be smart enough to realize that the second
> > must
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:31:04AM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote:
> On 03/30/10 09:58, Glenn Brunette wrote:
> >
> >Dan,
> >
> >I have to +1 all of your well-thought-out comments. As a potential
> >consuming of this functionality for the Immutable Service Container
> >project, answers to these questi
On 03/30/10 12:29 PM, Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 30 Mar 2010 at 01:20AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
1) In what order are the changes printed? If I saw:
+ /myfiles/rename_dir
R /myfiles/rename_dir -> /myfiles/rename_dir
My analyzer would need to be smart enough to realiz
On Tue 30 Mar 2010 at 07:21AM, Tim Haley wrote:
> On 3/30/10 5:35 AM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm wondering, will zfs diff work between two zfs pools?
> >
>
> No. Only between snapshots within the same dataset within the same pool.
Only within the same dataset? What about a snapsh
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:42:00PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
> On 03/30/10 12:29 PM, Dan Price wrote:
> >The example was slightly messed up, sorry; that caused misunderstanding.
> >I'm worried about this situation:
> >
> > snaps...@1
> > mv /myfiles/name1 /myfiles/name2
> > mk
On 03/30/10 01:25 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:42:00PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
On 03/30/10 12:29 PM, Dan Price wrote:
The example was slightly messed up, sorry; that caused misunderstanding.
I'm worried about this situation:
snaps...@1
mv /myfiles/na
On 3/29/10 10:54 PM, Dan Price wrote:
On Mon 29 Mar 2010 at 11:14AM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
On 03/29/10 11:01, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
How do commands like ls and find handle printing of filenames with
arbitrary characters (newlines and such)?
In general, badly.
Tim,
My
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
> It would be easy enough for me to print a 'time' column as the first
> column, and the output could then be sent to 'sort -n'. I'm not sure
> how people feel about that. Is that cheating? :-) The alternative
> is to AVL sort by that t
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:22:43PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
> You are correct that the command should work with clones, too, as
> though are desendant.
> For a clone we'd present its paths relative to where it is mounted.
I'd say make all paths relative to the root of the dataset, even when
the new
On 3/30/10 4:36 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
It would be easy enough for me to print a 'time' column as the first
column, and the output could then be sent to 'sort -n'. I'm not sure
how people feel about that. Is that cheating? :-)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nicolas Williams
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
>> It would be easy enough for me to print a 'time' column as the first
This is getting pretty close to "design by ARC" rather than "review by
ARC"; it might be a better use of
16 matches
Mail list logo
