Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-29 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
The case is approved. ___ opensolaris-arc mailing list opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-23 Thread Sebastien Roy
On 07/22/10 11:13 PM, Mark Haywood wrote: Nicolas Williams wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:43:37AM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote: What is the console message ? As mentioned in the case: "Similarly, if the IPMP service is disabled while IPMP groups are configured, the service stop method will di

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-23 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 23/07/2010 04:13, Mark Haywood wrote: Agreed. And after looking at other services and investigating transitioning into maintenance mode when the service is disabled, I believe that the best course of action is simply to get rid of the message. Switching into maintenance mode would require the

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
Girish Moodalbail wrote: On 07/21/10 08:52 PM, Artem Kachitchkine wrote: I am sponsoring this fast-track for Mark Haywood. Minor binding is requested. Timeout is set for 07/29/2010. -Artem Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/o

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Girish Moodalbail
On 07/21/10 08:52 PM, Artem Kachitchkine wrote: I am sponsoring this fast-track for Mark Haywood. Minor binding is requested. Timeout is set for 07/29/2010. -Artem Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All righ

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
Nicolas Williams wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:43:37AM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote: What is the console message ? As mentioned in the case: "Similarly, if the IPMP service is disabled while IPMP groups are configured, the service stop method will display warning messages to the con

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Ceri Davies
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:43:01PM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:52:09PM -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote: > >> > >> ifconfig will no longer fork(2)-exec(2) in.mpathd on-demand. The daemon > >> should be running, unless the service was explicitly disa

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:52:09PM -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote: I am sponsoring this fast-track for Mark Haywood. Minor binding is requested. Timeout is set for 07/29/2010. -Artem Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Darren J Moffat
Looks reasonable to me, with one tiny comment: exec='/lib/svc/method/net-ipmp %m' Given that in.mpathd is only really supposed to be started by the SMF service now why is a method script necessary why can't the exec method be in.mpathd itself ? -- Darren J Moffat __

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:52:09PM -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote: > I am sponsoring this fast-track for Mark Haywood. Minor binding is > requested. Timeout is set for 07/29/2010. > > -Artem > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI > This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracl

PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
I am sponsoring this fast-track for Mark Haywood. Minor binding is requested. Timeout is set for 07/29/2010. -Artem Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
On 07/22/10 04:26 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Looks reasonable to me, with one tiny comment: exec='/lib/svc/method/net-ipmp %m' Given that in.mpathd is only really supposed to be started by the SMF service now why is a method script necessary why can't the exec method be in.mpathd itself ?

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
On 07/22/10 11:39 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: On 22/07/2010 14:43, Mark Haywood wrote: Okay, now I'm wondering why that is appropriate for this stop method ? Why is this service so important that stopping it causes console messages ? Why is this service so much more important when it stops than

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:43:37AM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote: > >What is the console message ? > > As mentioned in the case: > > "Similarly, if the IPMP service is disabled while IPMP groups are > configured, the service stop method will display warning messages to > the console." This is useles

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 22/07/2010 14:27, Mark Haywood wrote: On 07/22/10 04:26 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Looks reasonable to me, with one tiny comment: exec='/lib/svc/method/net-ipmp %m' Given that in.mpathd is only really supposed to be started by the SMF service now why is a method script necessary why can't

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
On 07/22/10 09:28 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: On 22/07/2010 14:27, Mark Haywood wrote: On 07/22/10 04:26 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Looks reasonable to me, with one tiny comment: exec='/lib/svc/method/net-ipmp %m' Given that in.mpathd is only really supposed to be started by the SMF service

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 22/07/2010 14:43, Mark Haywood wrote: Okay, now I'm wondering why that is appropriate for this stop method ? Why is this service so important that stopping it causes console messages ? Why is this service so much more important when it stops than any other service ? Will this message disp

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Darren J Moffat
On 22/07/2010 14:36, Mark Haywood wrote: On 07/22/10 09:28 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: On 22/07/2010 14:27, Mark Haywood wrote: On 07/22/10 04:26 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Looks reasonable to me, with one tiny comment: exec='/lib/svc/method/net-ipmp %m' Given that in.mpathd is only really

Re: PSARC/2010/283 SMF service for in.mpathd

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Haywood
On 07/22/10 09:38 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: On 22/07/2010 14:36, Mark Haywood wrote: On 07/22/10 09:28 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: On 22/07/2010 14:27, Mark Haywood wrote: On 07/22/10 04:26 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Looks reasonable to me, with one tiny comment: exec='/lib/svc/method/net-i