Re: [osol-code] Re: use of vfork in tcsh

2006-10-31 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Roland Mainz wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > >> Roland Mainz writes: >> It's a priority problem, and the kind of one that perversely results from having too many open source things integrated with the Solaris distribution. :-< >>> "tcsh" lives in SFW, right ? >

Re: [shell-discuss] Re: [osol-code] Re: use of vfork in tcsh

2006-10-31 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Roland Mainz wrote: James Carlson wrote: Roland Mainz writes: "tcsh" lives in SFW, right ? Right. Does the update need to be ARC'ed in any way ? Updating to a new version of an existing open source package may need ARC review if it adds new interfaces or consumes new interfaces which aren

Re: [osol-code] Re: use of vfork in tcsh

2006-10-31 Thread Roland Mainz
James Carlson wrote: > Roland Mainz writes: > > > It's a priority problem, and the kind of one that perversely results > > > from having too many open source things integrated with the Solaris > > > distribution. :-< > > > > "tcsh" lives in SFW, right ? > > Right. Does the update need to be ARC'

Re: [osol-code] Queries regarding crash dump .....

2006-10-31 Thread Michael Shapiro
> > I have not tried a dump across nfs for a very long time. I believe it > only exists for diskless clients - you would not want to use it on > any regular systems. > Just FYI on this point: when I rewrote the panic code long ago, I did make dumps across NFS work, but in a very limited fashion

Re: [osol-code] Queries regarding crash dump .....

2006-10-31 Thread Gavin Maltby
Hi, On 10/29/06 08:54, Gaurav Dhiman wrote: Hi, I am studing the crash dump routines of opensoalris now days, mainly the flow of panic() funcion. Can someone let me know the answers of following questions. - What all can be configured as dump device ? - Swap partition on local disk is ok,