Re: [osol-discuss] Re: How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93?

2005-07-31 Thread Casper . Dik
At this point, it is clear you guys were not paying attention to the contents of the thread. The disagreement is over the community having the ability to work on a branch that is not stable. All of the Solaris releases would be on a stable branch that has the exact same interface stability

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-31 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 7/31/05, Shawn Leard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been involved with Linux since it was first available as a development only release. This length of time predates Solaris and extends back into the SunOS days so I feel I am in a position to offer good feedback. It is early on a

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93?

2005-07-31 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 06:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No; I don't think that, though I'd expect much of the unstable work not to happen on OpenSolaris .org actually, I'd hope that opensolaris.org and/or genunix.org would provide some way to publish/host work-in-progress (distinct from stuff

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: How would the ARC process look at this discussion of KSH 88-vs-93?

2005-07-31 Thread Casper . Dik
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 06:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No; I don't think that, though I'd expect much of the unstable work not to happen on OpenSolaris .org actually, I'd hope that opensolaris.org and/or genunix.org would provide some way to publish/host work-in-progress (distinct from stuff

Re: [osol-discuss] The teamware effect

2005-07-31 Thread Ian Collins
Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Jul 29, 2005, at 12:26 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: RTF I am telling you, point blank, based on both my experience within RTF the open source community and my research background in software RTF architecture, that OpenSolaris will fail to achieve the goals set RTF by

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-31 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
I think that you hit the nail on the head with that one. But that is ancient history. No one in the OpenSolaris community ( or Solaris community if there is a difference anymore ) is living in the past any more. Dennis Clarke Director and Admin for blastwave.org IHMO, in order for OpenSolaris to

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-31 Thread John Weekley
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 17:27, W. Wayne Liauh wrote: Don't forget that StarOffice is now included in Sun Solaris 10 Solaris 10 includes StarOffice 7 (based on OpenOffice.org 1.x). There are quite a few differences between OOo 2.0 and 1.x. This message posted from opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-31 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
Openoffice.org already provides a pretty decent (and current) port. Why reinvent the wheel? Almost all the Linux distros have their own OOo packages. But, wait. How many Linux distros are there competiting against each other? Perhaps this is one of the biggest differences between Solaris and

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Solaris vs. Linux

2005-07-31 Thread Rich Teer
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Dennis Clarke wrote: down anytime soon. I feel that Rich Teer would be hunkering into his chair and saying to himself ha, Dennis has another opinion breaking out of the gates, this will be good! You know me too well, my friend! When Dennis writes tomes like this, who