Actually, there are a lot of companies already using Solaris 10 in
production today. There are a lot of financial, pharma, government, and
telecom companies already using it. Most of the companies that are
already using it, were part of the customer beta tests last year. So
they had jumpstart on
On Monday 05 September 2005 10:11 am, Daniel Johnsen wrote:
Thanks for your replies, I will wait in suspense for ZFS to come on Solaris
and hopefully also on Linux :)
Wow, do you think it's easily portable to the Linux kernel?
How long do you think it might take them?
--
Alan DuBoff - Sun
On Laptops and Solaris x86 drivers, I see some ways of combining those
two (and potentially more) into one community. I'm thinking about the
user group community I formed, which now has about 10 individual groups
and three more in the queue. So, one community with 10 groups, not 10
individual
That's great! My group (Globalization) has translated and tested the
localized Solaris for many years. How about we start a separate
discussion (perhaps in the i18n-interest) on how to best organize
translation? It would be great for us to come up with a process that's
easy to follow for anyone
Young Joo Song wrote:
My group (Globalization) has translated and tested the
localized Solaris for many years. How about we start a separate
discussion (perhaps in the i18n-interest) on how to best organize
translation? It would be great for us to come up with a process that's
easy to follow for
Wow, do you think it's easily portable to the Linux
kernel?
How long do you think it might take them?
That was one of the questions I hoped to get answered with this thread ;)
What do you think / Do you know, how much % of the zfs code needs/needed to be
rewritten ?
Anyway I doubt it
My Sparc bias is showing. It's strictly a matter of taste. I have a history
of periodically diving into assembly language projects. My efforts to study
x86 assembly lanuage have always culminated in a violent motion away from. The
x86 architecture suffers mightily from the inverted pyramid
that's just your personal experience. My personal experience is that I have
recovered with reiserfs better than ext3...yes, you heard that right. reisefs
3.6 is as stable it gets, have been running it for about 2 years now. My system
hard powered off many times during these years, never once I
I put your feed into opensolaris.org. Should update shortly.
Jim
Matthew Alton wrote:
My Sparc bias is showing. It's strictly a matter of taste. I have a history of
periodically diving into assembly language projects. My efforts to study x86 assembly
lanuage have always culminated in a
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 06:56:02PM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Robert W. Fuller wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an instant, and I suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it would become useless
Nobody was
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:23:48PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all BSD style licenses are compatible with the GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#OrigBSD
If you read that whole FAQ, you can see that the GPL has problems with a
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:59:51PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 8/19/05, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an
instant, and I suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it
would become useless
On Sep 7, 2005, at 00:27, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 06:56:02PM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Robert W. Fuller wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an instant, and I
suspect
others would as well. Because at that point, it
i have heard others in the 53XXX zip code areas got there's as well...
so keep the faith they are coming and they look really nice
James Dickens
uadmin.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:54:23AM +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sep 7, 2005, at 00:27, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 06:56:02PM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Robert W. Fuller wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an instant,
On 9/6/05, James Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have heard others in the 53XXX zip code areas got there's as well...
so keep the faith they are coming and they look really nice
Got mine here today as well (77063; Houston, Texas). They look *really* nice!
Bill
| It used to be the case that if logging was enabled in the root disk
| that CPR did not work - not sure if that is still the case.
Works for me with logging on the root filesystem and S10.
Hugh.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
17 matches
Mail list logo
