Re: [osol-discuss] Re: sun4m, why the strong defense against putting it back in for last rel

2005-12-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: of interest in maintaining them, even Ultra-1 support for those who feel that they are happy to run the risk of 64 bit on UltraSPARC-I. This, to me, would be a far more worthwhile project. Yes, the US-I is long in

[osol-discuss] Server mini-distro?

2005-12-08 Thread Eric Boutilier
Seeking comments: I'm thinking we need a server mini-distro ISO. The idea would be to facilitate creating servers cafeteria-style... in other words, à la carte (ALaCartiX?). Basically it would go something like this: a) Install the ISO. b) Add your favorite auto-update tool[1]. c) Point it

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Is Sun Cluster really a free product now ?

2005-12-08 Thread Steven Sim
Hello; My sincere apologies. I am getting very confused following this thread. Is Sun Cluster (Java Availability Suite) now free for enterprise biz usage?? Yes or No? Warmest Regards Steven Sim Richard Elling wrote: Free, as I understand it, but not yet open-source. I'm no lawyer, but I

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Is Sun Cluster really a free product now ?

2005-12-08 Thread Matt Ingenthron
Steven Sim wrote: Hello; My sincere apologies. I am getting very confused following this thread. Is Sun Cluster (Java Availability Suite) now free for enterprise biz usage?? Yes or No? Yes. Product use in development and production are free. Completely free. Community support (i.e.

Re: [osol-discuss] Something a little less drastic that 4m,

2005-12-08 Thread Gavin Maltby
James Dickens wrote On 12/07/05 13:09,: While I can understand why no 4m, What I would like is something a bit easier, i just want ultraI support, the CPU no the u1 platform. I This one is a whole lot easier/cleaner than sun4m, as you might expect. The putback that ripped out support for

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris B27 and VMware 5.5 on Suse 9.3

2005-12-08 Thread Sean O'Neill
Well, I got B27 installed and running but there are some issues. Hoping someone knows about these. 1) The pcn interface doesn't work and won't plumb up at boot time. Once the box is up I can plumb it up but no network traffic flows between my VMNET interface in Linux and OpenSolaris.

[osol-discuss] Outage notification for bugs.opensolaris.org

2005-12-08 Thread Derek Cicero
PLEASE NOTE bugs.opensolaris.org will be unavailable tomorrow (12/09) at 10AM PST for 4 hours. Maintenance pages will be posted. -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris B27 and VMware 5.5 on Suse 9.3

2005-12-08 Thread Bill Rushmore
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:04, Sean O'Neill wrote: Well, I got B27 installed and running but there are some issues. Hoping someone knows about these. 1) The pcn interface doesn't work and won't plumb up at boot time. Once the box is up I can plumb it up but no network traffic flows between

[osol-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris B27 and VMware 5.5 on Suse 9.3

2005-12-08 Thread Sean O'Neill
How do you have VMWare setup with Networking, NAT, Bridged, etc.? If the hardware seems missing double check the VM settigs to make sure netowrk is still enabled. I've tried NAT and Bridge mode. Same thing. Interface isn't plumbed up at boot time. Are you using DHCP? If so try a

[osol-discuss] Re: i915GM Solaris Express 11/05

2005-12-08 Thread len
Yes. Somehow it booted using ACPI with a value of 8 (it doesnt work with 2), started solaris interactive installation and when it tries to test my video (I manually set it to 915GM, 12 notebook lcd and etc...) before proceeding the installation all it shows is a blank screen during test. I also