I'd like to have virtual consoles like the ones Linux has (at least on x86).
Of course one could use screen, but generally CTRL+A hotkey interferes with
e.g. bash hotkey to move to the first character in the cmd-line (yes, ctrl+a, a
is a workaround - but nothing more than a workaround).
Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 05:06 am, Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
After having problems of not having an adp driver available for my
64-bit system, I swapped the Adaptec AHA-2940 for a SymbiosLogic/NCR
sym85c8xx card (from Compaq).
Whaddya know? Solaris-express (snv_b34) doesn't have
Nigel Smith wrote:
Yes, please could you check report back if any work or progress is being made
on 'iSCSI target' support for Solaris.
If it were possible to team-up an SCSI target with the ZFS filesystem, it would
be really useful, and get lot's of new people using Solaris.
A good iSCSI
Interesting is that at CeBIT virtually no company did
show motherboards
for Opteron systems and even AMD did not show Opteron
info material in the
public part of the fair.
Given the fact that even a single Opteron machine is
something rare, it seems
that the prices are OK. Of course it
AMD 64 X2 serves the same purpose as single chip
Opteron and it is
much cheaper - why waste the money on it? :)
Because Opteron is supposed to be faster than X2, and it can something X2 can't
do -- scale beyond two CPUs.
And while I can shut a blind eye to that, you can't get a 1U-compatible
I'd like to have virtual consoles like the ones Linux has (at least on x86).
Of course one could use screen, but generally CTRL+A hotkey interferes with
e.g. bash hotkey to move to the first character in the cmd-line (yes, ctrl+a, a is a
workaround - but nothing more than a workaround).
Hi,
For several weeks I am trying to install Oracle Clustware 10g2 on SOlaris 8.
I need to install package provided by Oracle (ORCLudlm 64-bit reentrant).
This package needs Sun Cluster 3.1 only. But Solaris provides on Sun downloads
only Sun Cluster 4.0 or more recently. I have installed this
Where did you find Sun Cluster 4.0? This product does not exist!
The current version of Sun Cluster is 3.1, and version 3.2 is under
development; but there's no 4.0!
You can download the lastest version of Sun Cluster 3.1 from:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
Select the item
Hello!
I don't usually send these on but you're going to want to see this.
http://www.mygift321.com/?r=YQFUQ1ADKSc5CGIECigOi=gmailz=1tc=2
What do you think?
Talk soon.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Eric Boutilier wrote:
I'd like to have virtual consoles like the ones Linux has (at least
on x86).
Of course one could use screen, but generally CTRL+A hotkey
interferes with e.g. bash hotkey to move to the first character in the
cmd-line (yes, ctrl+a, a is a workaround - but nothing more
Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
On 3/22/06, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 05:06 am, Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
No, unfortunately there isn't. I tried to get the ncrs included into 64-bit,
Kudos to you for trying! :-)
but it was turned down with the reason being that the
Nenad Cimerman wrote:
I'd like to have virtual consoles like the ones Linux has (at least on x86).
There's a team at Sun working on this - they should be submitting
an OpenSolaris project proposal soon to bring this out into the
open.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
The following is the error we got in confguring
ccid-1.0.0 in Solaris running on sparc 9
checking for dlopen in -ldl... no
checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... no
checking whether pthreads work with -pthreads... no
checking for the pthreads library -lpthread... no
OK, not really a feature necessarily of Solaris but more of an
application. I really want VMware (or its equivalent), especially since
the SUNpci card is becoming obsolete on Sparc and there really isn't an
alternative on x64 yet. BrandZ is a nice idea but I need to
run a popular non-Unix like
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Bill Rushmore wrote:
OK, not really a feature necessarily of Solaris but more of an
application. I really want VMware (or its equivalent), especially since
the SUNpci card is becoming obsolete on Sparc and there really isn't an
alternative on x64 yet. BrandZ is a nice
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 08:17 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Nenad Cimerman wrote:
I'd like to have virtual consoles like the ones Linux has (at least on
x86).
There's a team at Sun working on this - they should be submitting
an OpenSolaris project proposal soon to bring this out into the
Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Bill Rushmore wrote:
OK, not really a feature necessarily of Solaris but more of an
application. I really want VMware (or its equivalent), especially since
the SUNpci card is becoming obsolete on Sparc and there really isn't an
alternative on x64 yet.
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 12:08 -0500, Bill Rushmore wrote:
OK, not really a feature necessarily of Solaris but more of an
application. I really want VMware (or its equivalent), especially since
the SUNpci card is becoming obsolete on Sparc and there really isn't an
alternative on x64 yet.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
a windows branded zone? that would be really really cool, can it be
done? is anyone working on it? I'm guessing it would be a titanic job
It would be cool, and I suppose it could be done, given enough
motivation. I have no idea if anyone is
Erast Benson wrote:
And I always wanted to have a mouse support in console, ala gpm(Linux)
and moused(BSD). Kernel support is needed.
It's already there in Solaris SPARC, where graphics cards have in kernel
frame buffers with ioctls to draw the cursor - it's just not well known
and pretty much
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:53 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
And I always wanted to have a mouse support in console, ala gpm(Linux)
and moused(BSD). Kernel support is needed.
It's already there in Solaris SPARC, where graphics cards have in kernel
frame buffers with
Erast Benson wrote:
This is a nice feature. But this is not what I wanted. I'd like to have
some way to distribute cooked mouse events to text only applications,
like screen, ncurses-based apps, generic console, etc.
You'ld just need to put code into curses or another library to read the
VUID
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:29 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
This is a nice feature. But this is not what I wanted. I'd like to have
some way to distribute cooked mouse events to text only applications,
like screen, ncurses-based apps, generic console, etc.
You'ld just
Hi,
As recently suggested on the ZFS list, I'd like to move from 3/06 of SX (not
CR!) to the more recent osol (b36? whatever it might be at now..)
I looked at the installation pages, it looks like there is a pre-built archive
I can (BFU?) install. Is it possible to simply upgrade my SX 3/06
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:51:16AM -0800, David J. Orman wrote:
I looked at the installation pages, it looks like there is a
pre-built archive I can (BFU?) install. Is it possible to simply
upgrade my SX 3/06 release? It says only SXCR is supported, but
people on IRC have said 3/06 is doable
If you just want to have build 36 installed, yes, you can Upgrade from
SX 3/06. If you want to have your own custom ON bits that you've
changed, or you're planning to do this later and want to get familiar
with BFU, you can use that utility with the current BFU archives
available from
On 03/20/06 19:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FMA looks like it's about 100k/cpu (ERPT_MAX_ERRS * max_ncpu * ERPT_DATA_SZ)
And they are all preallocated? Sounds like a bug to me.
Yes they are, so that we can fill error reports from any context
without worrying sbout kmem allocation, pil
David J. Orman wrote:
I'm not sure how I'd upgrade to build 36, as I don't see any SX releases
using b36.
Not yet - it's only been available inside Sun for a couple hours, and still
has testing to go through before being released as SXCR.
If you could just enlighten me as to how I can
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:36:35AM -1000, David J. Orman wrote:
I'm not sure how I'd upgrade to build 36, as I don't see any SX releases
using b36. Only b35 for CR of SX. Maybe it's my lack of understanding of
upgrading versus BFUing.
You'll have to wait for SXCR 36 to come out. According to
Hi All,
There are a bunch of things that I'd like to see in solaris. Although
some of these my be showing my lack of knowledge of solaris though...
- support for initramfs (rather than just plain ramdisks)
- better support for running without swap
o hence having
Hi Tanujit,
Please send cc -V output
thanks
M.Sridhar
tanujit medhi wrote On 03/22/06 09:39,:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
The following is the error we got in confguring
ccid-1.0.0 in Solaris running on sparc 9
checking for dlopen in -ldl... no
checking whether
You'll have to wait for SXCR 36 to come out. According to Karyn's
latest status note, it's on track for 3/31.
Thanks!
When most people say 'Upgrade' they mean the full upgrade process
offered by the installation CD/DVD/netinstaller. There's also
LiveUpgrade, another supported upgrade
I've never installed/used VMware, so at the risk of this being a
naive-sounding question (OTOH, maybe I'm not the only one thinking it)...
Q: If SunPCI-like (easy switching to Windows and back) functionality on
x86 is what you want today, you can use Windows as the host OS and
Solaris as a
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Q: If SunPCI-like (easy switching to Windows and back) functionality on
x86 is what you want today, you can use Windows as the host OS and
Solaris as a guest OS, correct? So I don't understand what the downside
is of doing that...
Are you
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Eric Boutilier wrote:
I've never installed/used VMware, so at the risk of this being a
Nor have I.
Q: If SunPCI-like (easy switching to Windows and back) functionality on x86 is
what you want today, you can use Windows as the host OS and Solaris as a guest
OS, correct?
Just when you think the big companies have all the
toys (enterprise servers), you find companies like
this making 16-cpu servers:
http://www.kraftway.com/products/g-scale_6016.html
(Kraftway G-Scale 6016)
also the IBM x455
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/xseries/x455.html
Also the NEC
I have used vmware since early v4 of workstation.
Pros:
easy net configs for hotels, Starbucks, and even the
EVDO and 1xRTT cellular broadband goodies. The guest
just sees a DHCP or static network that is stable...
Multiple releases of the OS at the same time,
And if you're ever at a conference where they have a booth, stop by.
You might get a free VMWare workstation license out of it. I've gotten
2 this way from previous LinuxWorld conferences.
cheers,
steve
Bill Walker - Sun Principal Engineer wrote:
I have used vmware since early v4 of
I intend to purchase one of the newer Macs and I was
wondering if there was any project to get Solaris to
boot on the Intel Macs or if Sun has any plans to
support the machines.
img src=http://images.quizilla.com/S/SobeNintendo/1092885255_ilaMonster.jpg;
border=0 alt=MonsterbrYou're a true
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 06:58 pm, Wai-Sun Chia wrote:
Kudos to you for trying! :-)
I had a couple of them myself.
Boo to whomever that turned you down.
Not really, it was only due to lack of resource and getting drivers done that
were available for 64-bit machines that folks could buy
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:32 pm, James C. McPherson wrote:
You could try using glm instead. I was involved for a while with the
effort to port it from sparc. It integrated into snv_28.
5026812 Need 64bit glm driver support on x86 platform
Ah, I do remember talk about this driver having
Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:32 pm, James C. McPherson wrote:
You could try using glm instead. I was involved for a while with the
effort to port it from sparc. It integrated into snv_28.
5026812 Need 64bit glm driver support on x86 platform
Ah, I do remember talk about this
Bill R., Bill W., Rich, and Stephen --
Thanks for the primer on VMWare-on-Windows-with-Solaris-guest. My
take-away: For people who want to have a box they can switch between
Windows and Solaris a lot on, I think I'd still recommend free VMWare on
(unsupported) Windows XP as an OK option --
43 matches
Mail list logo
