What about organising an article or story on slashdot.org for every SX
release or two or three?
Moazam Raja wrote:
Here are some more Solaris/OpenSolaris blogs,
http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/blog/index.php
http://richteer.blogspot.com/
-Moazam
On Apr 28, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Moazam Raja
Wasn't 3/06 b33? I'm going by memory but that's what I recall. The
download page does seem rather odd, there is two downloads available
for both ISO and DVD - as in two sets. One is b36 and one is b33, but
both are labeled 4/06. ??? :)
David
On Apr 28, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Dennis Clarke
Darren Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about organising an article or story on slashdot.org for every SX
release or two or three?
The right platforms would be
freshmeat.net
sourcewell.berlios.de
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
Venky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this blog forwarded to me:
http://nb.inode.co.nz/articles/Solaris10_Evaluation.html
Hidden among the rants are some interesting points about Solaris 10.
The typical crap I did see from othter Linux advocates :-(
I did look at the least priv comments and
Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:09:42PM +0530, Venky wrote:
I had this blog forwarded to me:
http://nb.inode.co.nz/articles/Solaris10_Evaluation.html
Hidden among the rants are some interesting points about Solaris 10.
If they're there, they're
Venky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this blog forwarded to me:
http://nb.inode.co.nz/articles/Solaris10_Evaluation.html
Hidden among the rants are some interesting points about Solaris 10.
The typical crap I did see from othter Linux advocates :-(
I did look at the least priv comments and
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Miner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The Live Media project would support the creation of OpenSolaris
distributions which run well on CD, DVD, or flash memory devices. There
are three areas of work envisioned:
Are we talking about creating a
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Darren Reed wrote:
What about organising an article or story on slashdot.org for every SX
release or two or three?
Are you volunteering Darren? :-) But seriously I wouldn't mind helping
out on this.
I do think this is a great idea. One thing I have been unable to
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 12:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this completely misses the the big picture engineering we
at Sun employ: we don't hack away at 100 little problems with itty
bitty improvements; we are trained to walk backwards until we
have an overview over all of the 100 issues
Would someone be willing to help me understand what I need to download and to
do to get Solaris installed on a Mac Intel ? If I can at least get an idea of
what is required for booting and running a base Solaris install I could then at
least write a How To for the rest of us mortals.
This
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Miner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The Live Media project would support the creation of OpenSolaris
distributions which run well on CD, DVD, or flash memory devices. There
are three areas of work envisioned:
Phil Plouffe wrote:
This is the even more tested edition and, in my
opinion, really solid:
Is there any modifications made vs SCXR released ? Or is it really just more
tested ?
Same ISO image files, just more testing and more time to get docs
and release notes written and published on
Nikolay Molchanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How different is their make version (or better:
What are the differences ?) ?
GNU makefiles and SUN makefiles have different syntax,
and this is the main difference between gmake and dmake.
Sun Studio
Are there any plans to port Yast to Solaris 10 since it is an Open Source
piece of software. I am just wondering how much of a technical burden it
would be to do a port.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Wine now uses softlinks named x: (where x is the device name to link to)
placed in the filesystem. Wine preserved the Windows naming including the
colon in the link name. Unfortunately ld.so.1 doesn't seem to be able to load
a library across these links being confused by the colon in the name
Robert Lunnon wrote:
Wine now uses softlinks named x: (where x is the device name to link to)
placed in the filesystem. Wine preserved the Windows naming including the
colon in the link name. Unfortunately ld.so.1 doesn't seem to be able to load
a library across these links being confused by
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Darren Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-28 16:03]:
Hi,
To bring together the various groups of people who are interested in
talking about Solaris for embedded use, I'd like to propose creating a
new discussion forum, embedded-discuss.
The purpose of this forum would
17 matches
Mail list logo
