I am responsible for asking Nexenta about the apparent lack of sgen. I was
surprised that such a standard component wasn't included at this stage. At
issue is that any tape changer management requires this driver. Either we need
to have that a part of ON, or if not, make sure its allowable to pa
Erast Benson wrote:
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
Any roadmap on those bits? What was the reason for not including them in
closed bins again? (sorry if this question were asked before)
Hi Erast,
A q
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
Any roadmap on those bits? What was the reason for not including them in
closed bins again? (sorry if this question were asked before)
Erast
_
Philip Brown wrote:
While blastwave does it, I can't use blastwave as a part of some
other solution. And that's the problem with all the package
management systems - they're fine, as long as you use them in
complete isolation.
Exactly. Say I want PHP to run with the bundled Apache. Blastwave
w
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Richard Lowe wrote:
...
As said previously on IRC (re-said here purely so it's actually in this
discussion). SX:CR should not, in any way, diverge from Nevada. Adding
some of the things you mentioned to Nevada would be a good thing,
placing them in SX:CR but nowhere else wo
> "Jim" == Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> Does anyone know what these releases represent in terms of lines of
Jim> code?
Jim> * OS/Net Consolidation 6/14/05
I can't answer that exactly, but when I looked at build 42, the lines of
text (including makefiles, readmes, comments,
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:16:38AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps we need to understand which OS release this is exactlyu and
> how single user boot is done.
>
> (If it boots from a pre-S10 network image, SCSI options will be set
> to "crawl")
Also, certain boot image versions, had net
This works on my system, /boot/grub/menu.lst
#-- ADDED BY BOOTADM - DO NOT EDIT --
title Solaris Nevada snv_42 X86
kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
#-END BOOTADM
title Solaris Nevada snv_42 X86 - 32 bit
Hello,
> I have an Opteron system, which is of course 64-bit.
> But I also have a qlogic ISP2100 HBA, for which only
> 32-bit driver is available on the i86pc platform.
> The 32-bit driver won't load on a 64-bit system, so
> I need to somehow make Solaris boot 32-bit.
>
> But how??? Is there eve
Hi David,
Check out NetBSD's pkgsrc system (it's not just for NetBSD). Lots of
useful stuff.
- Source based, however you can build binary packages and distribute
those
- can create SysV Solaris packages (not sure how well that works)
It's quite nice.
Obviously, there's also blastwave.org,
AFAIK, the _only_ reason for SX:CR (as contrasted to regular Solaris Express
releases)
is to provide the environment suitable for building the source.
That it might have most (but not all) of what it takes to be cool on a
non-critical desktop (as well
as for anything one might want to do with th
UNIX admin writes:
> I don't know where I would rightly ask this, so I decided to stick it into
> the general discussion.
>
> I have an Opteron system, which is of course 64-bit. But I also have a qlogic
> ISP2100 HBA, for which only 32-bit driver is available on the i86pc platform.
> The 32-b
>
>Edit the path to the kernel that GRUB uses, and remove the amd64 part.
By default, no path is given and it defaults to the "best"; so
you need to specify kernel/unix on the multiboot line.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-dis
On Jun 18, 2006, at 3:46 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
I don't know where I would rightly ask this, so I decided to stick
it into the general discussion.
I have an Opteron system, which is of course 64-bit. But I also
have a qlogic ISP2100 HBA, for which only 32-bit driver is
available on the i8
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:28:20AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> > Nice troll, but stuff like Looking Glass proves it's
> > an unfounded
> > bias. Bad programming makes apps slow.
>
> It's not a troll, it's a fact Sun marketing doesn't like to hear! Just run a
> Java program in a web browser, then
I don't know where I would rightly ask this, so I decided to stick it into the
general discussion.
I have an Opteron system, which is of course 64-bit. But I also have a qlogic
ISP2100 HBA, for which only 32-bit driver is available on the i86pc platform.
The 32-bit driver won't load on a 64-bi
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 19:56 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
> Isn't there a significant overlap between the
> firefox/thunderbird/mozilla packages?
Sure there is, but I'm not going to try and quantify it.
Mozilla is going to be removed soon and there's significant
overlap between ff/tb so if you wish su
> Nice troll, but stuff like Looking Glass proves it's
> an unfounded
> bias. Bad programming makes apps slow.
It's not a troll, it's a fact Sun marketing doesn't like to hear! Just run a
Java program in a web browser, then you'll rightly know what it's like watching
the paint dry. And don't e
Ian Collins wrote:
...
Isn't there a significant overlap between the
firefox/thunderbird/mozilla packages?
Oh now you've opened a can of worms.
Yes, there is significant overlap with those packages.
Yes, there has been (and one assumes, will continue to be) a long
and involved and in some
Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 11:21 -0700, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>
>
>>When we released OpenSolaris last year it represented about 10 million
>>lines of code. But since then, we've released code sixteen times (save
>>the binary releases).
>>
>>Does anyone know what these rele
20 matches
Mail list logo
