April Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a very brief status for those who are interested...
The ksh93 project team is currently working out the final details
on the PSARC case for the ksh93 integration project. The expectation
is that it will be submitted for an open PSARC review by the
Jerry,
On 7/31/06, Jerry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have certainly wondered the same.
I am currently running Solaris 10 on Sparc with the Openwin packages installed
from Solaris 8 with no problems. I don't know if something similar would be
possible using binaries from Solaris 2.5.1 PPC?
Jerry,
On 7/31/06, Jerry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have certainly wondered the same.
I am currently running Solaris 10 on Sparc with the Openwin packages
installed
from Solaris 8 with no problems. I don't know if something similar would
be
possible using binaries from Solaris 2.5.1
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Cyril Plisko wrote:
Bottom line - I wouldn't count on old Solaris PPC packages. I think one
still can find XView sources and build them on modern system. As for
OpenLook toolkit - I am not sure its source is available.
Check out
http://home.nyc.rr.com/twopks/olvwm/
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Cyril Plisko wrote:
Bottom line - I wouldn't count on old Solaris PPC packages. I think one
still can find XView sources and build them on modern system. As for
OpenLook toolkit - I am not sure its source is available.
Check out
http://home.nyc.rr.com/twopks/olvwm/
I propose a new Open Solaris project to be called DHCPv6 Client.
This short-term project will implement RFC 3315 (Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)) support in the existing
Solaris dhcpagent. Associated features (snoop, dhcpinfo, ifconfig)
will be updated as well, and NDP RA
Original-Message
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:57:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [powerpc-discuss] OpenWindows - How much is
lost forever ?
still can find XView sources and build them on
Bonnie has just determined that sgen is clear to be open-sourced... I've
filed CR 640 to track it and will try to have the fix in this week
or next.
cheers,
steve
Erast Benson wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 11:14 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
James Carlson wrote:
I propose a new Open Solaris project to be called DHCPv6 Client.
This short-term project will implement RFC 3315 (Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)) support in the existing
Solaris dhcpagent. Associated features (snoop, dhcpinfo, ifconfig)
will be
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, James Carlson wrote:
I propose a new Open Solaris project to be called DHCPv6 Client.
...
This new project should be associated with (and endorsed by) the
Networking community.
+1
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1
Just let you know .
I did a test could upnp mediaserver coded for Linux work in Solaris.
There is unsupported version for Linux. in buffalo US site.
But as this server software is implemented in Java.
it works out of the box in Solaris 10 X86 (S10 06/06 U2) too.
Just unpack archive to directory.
On 8/1/06, Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Message
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:57:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [powerpc-discuss] OpenWindows - How much is
lost forever
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I propose a new Open Solaris project to be called DHCPv6 Client.
This short-term project will implement RFC 3315 (Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)) support in the existing
Solaris dhcpagent. Associated features (snoop, dhcpinfo,
Rainer Orth writes:
The project does not implement a DHCPv6 server. The server side may
be handled by the existing Wide-DHCPv6 server or by a separate
project.
I had a quick look at compiling it on Solaris during an IPv6 tutorial on
SANE 2006 in Delft this spring: it seemed quite BSD
Rainer Orth writes:
Indeed. The key issue, though, is that this isn't that project. ;-}
True :-) Which servers do you plan to test the new v6 client against?
(We should probably take this over to network-discuss at some point ...)
That's to be determined. I do plan to do compatibility
Yes, that would be the general idea.
April
From: Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:00:04 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] ksh93 integration status
User-Agent: nail 11.2
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Rainer Orth wrote:
True :-) Which servers do you plan to test the new v6 client against?
Speaking of servers, I just stumbled across the following announcement from
ISC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dhcp-announcem=115275750414621w=2
So there's another v6
Hi All,
I wanted to inform you that the OpenSolaris newsletter will be sent out
on September 1st. We are collaborating on a summer issue with July and
August combined together. If you have any contributions, please send
them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Linda Bernal
Thanks, Alexy. You have a +1 from Rainer. I'll contact you
offline to get you set up. (Sorry for the delay.)
Eric
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Alexey Starovoytov wrote:
The exact version of GCC to be bundled is an exhausting topic.
We can decide on the final GCCfss/gcc version latter.
That's why the
Thanks, Stephen. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline
to get you set up.
Eric
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Stephen Lau wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of a new project: ONNV (OS/Net
Nevada) which would be a project under the (soon-to-be-renamed-to ON)
community. The project's main
Thanks, yxn. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
Eric
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Yu Xiangning wrote:
Hello OpenSolaris folks,
I would like to open an OpenSolaris project - Packet Event Framework
(PEF), on behalf of the PEF project team.
The Packet Event Framework project
I am not sure I am proposing a new community, or just expressing myself with a
problem that has existed and will continue to get worse, in the way
opensource software is incorporated on OpenSolaris distributions.
This could be a long message, if it annoys you to read lengthly messages,
please
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is merely to say I think we need to have some type of
standards base, one
that can try to align these different distributions with Solaris in
a way
that will make their OpenSolaris distribution complimentary to
Solaris and
allow the
Hello.
The NFS RDMA project page is up and running at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/nfsrdma/
At this point, the basics are in place. We expect to post
a snapshot of the current project source soon.
Subscription info for nfsrdma-discuss may be found at:
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 03:32 pm, Jasse Jansson wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is merely to say I think we need to have some type of
standards base, one
that can try to align these different distributions with Solaris in
a way
that will make their
Many apologies for the delay of your weekly ON nightly delivery. We
should have something up tomorrow morning. We've encountered some
delays in getting the Studio 11 compilers posted...
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris //
26 matches
Mail list logo
