Re: [osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 22:18 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > ...and here we go again! :-) > > No. > > Not true. > > We never went the first time. We didn't even climb up the hill so > you can forget about saying "here we go" when this is all an arm > chair debate with no effect on the ou

[osol-discuss] About Solaris 10 telnet session disconnect termly

Guru, My solaris 10 telnet session will be disconnected automatically after idle for a few minutes(I don't the actual seconds),can anyone show me how to disable the telnet timeout feature ? Thx in advance. Regards, Simon ___ opensolaris-discuss mailin

[osol-discuss] Re: Many problems on a Dell Latitude D820

ok, the 32 bit hang seems to be related to 6446729, and the workaround there (tsc_gethrtime_enable/W 0) works and allows both cores to start. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolari

Re: [osol-discuss] zfs file-server boot redundancy

On 27/09/2006, at 4:49 AM, Ryan Ross wrote: I would like to set up a Raid-Z/ZFS file server for my home use. I have 4 hard drives I'd like to stripe and still have some semblence of redundancy. I will most likely be using Belenix or Nexenta, I haven't decided (trying them out in VMware).

[osol-discuss] Many problems on a Dell Latitude D820

Dual core T7400 Merom 64 bit cpu; w/ solaris 10 update 2 + patches (118855-19) 64 bit boot: only works with acpi-user-options=2 (which means I only get one of the cores) ... any other value causes a panic on boot: isa0 at root panic[cpu0]/thread=fbc22d40: vmem_hash_delete(800090

Re: [osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote: > On 9/27/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Given this sort of perspective being rolled out by the FSF and similar >> things being said by members of the Debian project I am wondering >> what value >> the CDDL has anymore. It seems to be fuel for a fu

Re: [osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

On 9/27/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Given this sort of perspective being rolled out by the FSF and similar things being said by members of the Debian project I am wondering what value the CDDL has anymore. It seems to be fuel for a funeral pyre built by those that would critici

Re: [osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

What annoys me most about the whole GPL versus the world licensing bunfight is that nobody bothers to try to separate the ideology of the FSF (which *I* summarise as "owning stuff is bad") from the good work (and works) which the GPLv2 has enabled over the years. I for one find it incredibly off

Re: [osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

> ...and here we go again! :-) No. Not true. We never went the first time. We didn't even climb up the hill so you can forget about saying "here we go" when this is all an arm chair debate with no effect on the outcome. > But yes, it is bad that nobody legal from SUN never contacted F

Re: [osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

...and here we go again! :-) But yes, it is bad that nobody legal from SUN never contacted FSF and didn't ask to clarify those misleading statements... Its never too late folks! On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 22:02 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > This is fairly damning I think : > > http://www.fsf.org/lice

[osol-discuss] The FSF Website says "not to use the CDDL"

This is fairly damning I think : http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses Clearly it dictates : Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) This is a free software license which is not a strong copyleft; it has some complex restrictions that make it i

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Tulip Driver

On Tuesday 26 September 2006 03:28 pm, W. Wayne Liauh wrote: > I was not sure whether this (pci1317,0985) was the right (vendor, product) > ID b/c the number 1317 was assigned to ADMtek. But after a q & d search, I > found out that ADMtek makes NIC chipsets for Linksys. So this seems should > be

[osol-discuss] Re: new install help

A simple ifconfig -a will get ya what you need too. Take a look at UNIX in a nutshell This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Mounting a PCFS fixed disk with Solaris 8 for Sparc

I'm currently stumped with the problem of mounting a fixed disk with a single FAT32 partition (created by vxWorks) using Solaris 8 for Sparc. We have been in contact with Sun and were simply told that, "Creating and mounting a pcfs on a sparc-based fixed disk is not supported." In fact, as I

[osol-discuss] Re: Tulip Driver

I was not sure whether this (pci1317,0985) was the right (vendor, product) ID b/c the number 1317 was assigned to ADMtek. But after a q & d search, I found out that ADMtek makes NIC chipsets for Linksys. So this seems should be OK. Now, is there any way I can install this aliases file during (

[osol-discuss] Re: Tulip Driver

> > Where can I find tulip driver (for use with, e.g., > some Linksys NICs) for Solaris x86? > > dnet(7D) > > -- > James Carlson, KISS Network ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From Linux, I found (or I think I found) the vender_id (Linksys) to be 1317, >and the product_id (NC100) to b

Re: [osol-discuss] for review : snv_20060918 build/BFU instructions

> Dennis Clarke wrote: > >>I wrote this update such that new users would be able to follow really >> simple >>step by step instructions. >> >>http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0050/index.html >> >>Let me know if anything out of order is in there. >> >>Thanks. >> >> >> > > Your article is v

Re: [osol-discuss] for review : snv_20060918 build/BFU instructions

Dennis Clarke wrote: >I wrote this update such that new users would be able to follow really simple >step by step instructions. > >http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0050/index.html > >Let me know if anything out of order is in there. > >Thanks. > > > Your article is very good and certai

cr.0 _/_ Re: [osol-discuss] for review : snv_20060918 build/BFU instructions

Dennis Clarke wrote: >I wrote this update such that new users would be able to follow really simple >step by step instructions. > >http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0050/index.html > >Let me know if anything out of order is in there. > >Thanks. > > > "for nearly a year now" should rea

[osol-discuss] for review : snv_20060918 build/BFU instructions

I wrote this update such that new users would be able to follow really simple step by step instructions. http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0050/index.html Let me know if anything out of order is in there. Thanks. -- Dennis Clarke ___ openso

[osol-discuss] Questions about OpenSol page allocation?

Two questions: 1. What page fault happens, how does opensolaris pick the page frame to establish the mapping? I mean which physical frame will be picked? What is the algorithm here? Is the algorithm like page coloring implemented? 2. How does the opensolaris maintain the free page list? Any in

[osol-discuss] zfs file-server boot redundancy

I would like to set up a Raid-Z/ZFS file server for my home use. I have 4 hard drives I'd like to stripe and still have some semblence of redundancy. I will most likely be using Belenix or Nexenta, I haven't decided (trying them out in VMware). The one problem I have come across is the the UFS

[osol-discuss] Re: new install help

> as root, run: > > /usr/X11/bin/scanpci > > Francois Is there something like "Solaris Commands in a Nutshell"? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

It is the "regular" SUNWlibC. The contents of SUNWlibC are not part of any SUNWspro package. HTHs! /kso UNIX admin wrote: Are these from the SUNWspro package, or just the "regular" SUNWlibC? -- Kuldip Oberoi Product Line Mgr, Sun Studio (Web) http://developer.sun.com/sunstudio (Blog)

Re: [osol-discuss] [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

Nope, not in the current timeframe. /kso Felix Schulte wrote: On 9/26/06, Kuldip Oberoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howdy, I'd like to announce the immediate availability of the SUNWlibC package: http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/devpro/ This package contains important shared librarie

Re: [osol-discuss] [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

On 9/26/06, Kuldip Oberoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howdy, I'd like to announce the immediate availability of the SUNWlibC package: http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/devpro/ This package contains important shared libraries that many C++ applications, such as the Java VM, are dependent on

Re: [osol-discuss] [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

Good catches to the copy/paste errors of the text filenames on that page.  We'll get that fixed ASAP. Glad to hear that the actual binaries appear to be correct/working. Thanks! /kso Martin Bochnig wrote: Martin Bochnig wrote: Hello, there is a minor cosmetical error on the

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Felix Schulte wrote: > Will ON refuse to compile because the certificate is missing? Can this > certificate check disabled in the makefiles? Where is that check? Why > is this crypto junk needed? By "certified", I think Casper is referring to the combination of Studio 11 plus

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

The tarball of Sun Studio 11 at: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/sun_studio_11_tools/ ...should be building the current source. The tarball is a subset of the the complete product (e.g. took out sun perf lib, I believe to save space, etc.) and neither this versi

[osol-discuss] Re: new install help

as root, run: /usr/X11/bin/scanpci Among the various things printed, you should see a line for ethernet. On my machine: pci bus 0x0002 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x14e4 device 0x16a6 Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5702X Gigabit Ethernet Same thing for the sound card. Mine is: pci

[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: WWAN (Wireless Wide Area Network)

Is there a preliminary version available somewhere of this driver? I have a Verizon V620 I've been dying to use under solaris on my laptop. Thanks, Francois This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-di

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

Felix Schulte wrote: On 9/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 8/2/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sun Studio 11 software is available for the OpenSolaris Community >> >> Sun Studio 11 software can now be used by the OpenSolaris Community, as >> the ON Consoli

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

On 8/2/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sun Studio 11 software is available for the OpenSolaris Community Sun Studio 11 software can now be used by the OpenSolaris Community, as the ON Consolidation, now builds with Sun Studio 11. It can be downloaded from the Tools community at: http

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Marvell Yukon will not neg to 1000 Fdx

>I used the original Marvell Yukon driver for Solaris. Same deal, and with skge >driver as well. It' s the problem with both skge and yukonx drivers and that paricular PHY/NIC. > >The real question is, how do we go about fixing it, resp. who needs to be >contacted so that the dr iver will be fix

Re: [osol-discuss] new install help

Ignacio Marambio Catán writes: > interface names are different in solaris, they depend on the actual > nic you have, for example, realtek cards are named rtls0, check in the > hcl [0] to see if your nick is supported at all. you can list the > available interfaces using ifconfig -a You'll probably

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

On 9/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Will ON refuse to compile because the certificate is missing? Can this >certificate check disabled in the makefiles? Where is that check? Why >is this crypto junk needed? Certified as in "believed to work OK with". Ah OK The unpatche

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

>Will ON refuse to compile because the certificate is missing? Can this >certificate check disabled in the makefiles? Where is that check? Why >is this crypto junk needed? Certified as in "believed to work OK with". The unpatched compilers will not produce working code. Casper

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

On 9/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 8/2/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sun Studio 11 software is available for the OpenSolaris Community >> >> Sun Studio 11 software can now be used by the OpenSolaris Community, as >> the ON Consolidation, now builds with

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Sun Studio 11 available

>On 8/2/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sun Studio 11 software is available for the OpenSolaris Community >> >> Sun Studio 11 software can now be used by the OpenSolaris Community, as >> the ON Consolidation, now builds with Sun Studio 11. >> >> It can be downloaded from the Tools co

Re: [osol-discuss] SunSSH and PAM

Vincenzo Sciarra wrote: Someone can explain me interaction between SunSSH and PAM? See the SECURITY section of sshd(1M) man page. -- Darren J Moffat ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Re: Marvell Yukon will not neg to 1000 Fdx

I used the original Marvell Yukon driver for Solaris. Same deal, and with skge driver as well. It's the problem with both skge and yukonx drivers and that paricular PHY/NIC. The real question is, how do we go about fixing it, resp. who needs to be contacted so that the driver will be fixed?

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:30 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Friday 22 September 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers > >> all should have names ending in "e". > > > >Really, I hadn't heard about that. > > I'm go

Re: [osol-discuss] Asterisk success

On Friday 22 September 2006 06:15 am, Dick Davies wrote: > On 21/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for suitably modified > > miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash. > > > > > > (We've installed Solaris on a flash card device on o

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

>On Friday 22 September 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers >> all should have names ending in "e". > >Really, I hadn't heard about that. I'm going to ask the author then. (I thought you were at least involved in getti

[osol-discuss] Re: [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

Are these from the SUNWspro package, or just the "regular" SUNWlibC? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] SunSSH and PAM

Someone can explain me interaction between SunSSH and PAM? Thanks ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

>On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >What kind of hairy transition will you need to go through? >> >> Renaming the ethernet driver of a headless internet facing system is >> difficult. >> >> - Remove the "rh" driver and add the "vfe" driver. >> - Change all the inst

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >What kind of hairy transition will you need to go through? > > Renaming the ethernet driver of a headless internet facing system is > difficult. > > - Remove the "rh" driver and add the "vfe" driver. > - Change all the instances of

Re: [osol-discuss] [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

Martin Bochnig wrote: >Hello, > >there is a minor cosmetical error on the dl page >http://dlc.sun.com/osol/devpro/downloads/current/ : > >"SUNWlibC binaries (SPARC) > >devpro-SUNWlibC-closed-bins-

Re: [osol-discuss] [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

Hello, there is a minor cosmetical error on the dl page http://dlc.sun.com/osol/devpro/downloads/current/ : "SUNWlibC binaries (SPARC) devpro-SUNWlibC-closed-bins-20060918.i386.tar.bz2 OBL

Re: [osol-discuss] Announcement : LiveUSB scripts for Belenix released

Hi, Moinak Ghosh wrote: > Erast Benson wrote: > >> On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 21:14 +0530, Anil verve wrote: >> >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I've been working on creating a liveUSB for a few weeks and now have a >>> script ready :) >>> >> >> >> Quite cool achievement! >> >> Also, I'd like to note

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

>What kind of hairy transition will you need to go through? Renaming the ethernet driver of a headless internet facing system is difficult. - Remove the "rh" driver and add the "vfe" driver. - Change all the instances of "rh" in the OS to "vfe" - hostname.XX, dhcp.XX - ipfilte

Re: [osol-discuss] [Announcement] SUNWlibC is Now Available

YEZ ! Thanks. M. Kuldip Oberoi wrote: > Howdy, > > I'd like to announce the immediate availability of the SUNWlibC package: > >http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/devpro/ > > This package contains important shared libraries that many C++ > applications, such as the Java VM, are dependent o

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

On Friday 22 September 2006 04:52 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know where this renaming came from; clearly we will not be > renaming our drivers but somehow in the process all of the drivers from > our Japanese friend are being renamed. We're having him change all of them to end in z thi

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Asterisk success

On Friday 22 September 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers > all should have names ending in "e". Really, I hadn't heard about that. -- Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group __

[osol-discuss] SunSSH and PAM

Someone can explain me interaction between SunSSH and PAM? Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Announcement : LiveUSB scripts for Belenix released

Erast Benson wrote: On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 21:14 +0530, Anil verve wrote: Hello all, I've been working on creating a liveUSB for a few weeks and now have a script ready :) Quite cool achievement! Also, I'd like to note here that installation of Nexenta on removable media like USB was