This should work.
Jörg
Being still more used to Linux disk-names like /dev/hda, I find 4
disks(?): c0t1d0p0..4, c0t1d0s0..15, c1d0p0..4 and c1d0s0..15. The disk
that is destined to be used is the 1st drive, 2nd IDE controller, or in
Linux terms: /dev/hdc. The CDROM drive is 2nd drive, 1st
Being still more used to Linux disk-names like /dev/hda, I find 4
disks(?): c0t1d0p0..4, c0t1d0s0..15, c1d0p0..4 and c1d0s0..15. The disk
that is destined to be used is the 1st drive, 2nd IDE controller, or in
Linux terms: /dev/hdc. The CDROM drive is 2nd drive, 1st IDE controller.
These are
Huub wrote:
This should work.
Jörg
Being still more used to Linux disk-names like /dev/hda, I find 4
disks(?): c0t1d0p0..4, c0t1d0s0..15, c1d0p0..4 and c1d0s0..15. The
disk that is destined to be used is the 1st drive, 2nd IDE controller,
or in Linux terms: /dev/hdc. The CDROM drive is
Hello again all,
Just a reminder that the next LOSUG meeting is just a week away!
Please do not forget to let me know if you plan to attend.
For more information, please visit:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/losug/
We hope to see you on the 15th!
Thanks and
Here you try to newfs the full disk.
You need to newfs the slices you want ufs filesystems on, e.g.,
c0t1d0s0
Casper
Thank you. That worked. And another problem shows up. According to step
5., I should copy the files tree using 'star': star -copy -p -sparse
-no-fsync -time -xdot
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
Zones (zone upgrade not yet supported in Nevada, I think)?
Checked the log file?
Casper
Huub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here you try to newfs the full disk.
You need to newfs the slices you want ufs filesystems on, e.g.,
c0t1d0s0
Casper
Thank you. That worked. And another problem shows up. According to step
5., I should copy the files tree using 'star': star
You did not follow the instructions in README.install:
star -copy -p -sparse -no-fsync -time -xdot bs=1m fs=32m -C /.cdrom/ . /mnt
Jörg
I missed that space between . and /mnt. Though I mounted this way:
mount /dev/dsk/c1d0s0 /mnt, now it gives:
star: I/O error. Cannot make dir './'.
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
Did you have any zones configured perhaps? If zones are present you won't be
presented with the Upgrade option.
Menno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
Zones (zone upgrade not yet supported in Nevada, I think)?
No, not yet. Due soon. Did you
Huub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You did not follow the instructions in README.install:
star -copy -p -sparse -no-fsync -time -xdot bs=1m fs=32m -C /.cdrom/ . /mnt
Jörg
I missed that space between . and /mnt. Though I mounted this way:
mount /dev/dsk/c1d0s0 /mnt, now it
I'm working on a project that uses a fibre-channel raid across several systems
(not simultaneously). The raid is formatted with a FAT32 file system so that
it can be accessed from VxWorks, Windows and Solaris. We are running Solaris
10 06/06 for Sparc.
The raid is capable of a raw data rate
qlc.conf, how to make one card in 2 gb and 2 in 4gb ?
thank
sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Are there any known performance issues with using FAT32 or are any tricks that
could increase the performance?
FAT32 is really slow, perhaps more so in Solaris but also in general.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Are you interested in helping with a project rewriting the PCFS driver ?
In short, PCFS for FAT32 s*cks. It's nowhere close to the performance it
could have. Now FAT32 surely has abysmal (non-)performance in the degraded
case (think a 4GB file made from 8 million 512-Byte fragments), but it
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Huub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You did not follow the instructions in README.install:
star -copy -p -sparse -no-fsync -time -xdot bs=1m fs=32m -C /.cdrom/ . /mnt
Jörg
I missed that space between . and /mnt. Though I mounted this way:
mount /dev/dsk/c1d0s0 /mnt, now
I'm looking on new roadmap page at:
http://opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/
For building OpenSolaris distro we all need:
1) Manual pages for ON/NWS commands and utilities;
2) Locales for other than C and iso_8859_1 (/usr/lib/locale);
3) iconv tables (/usr/lib/iconv);
What are the plan to
Why have all lists at opensolaris.org a -discuss ending? Its confusing.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 8, 2006 6:58 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an automatically generated
Jay,
Does anyone know how to calculate a new checksum for the DVD VTOC? Any help
would be greatly appreciated.
I'm not an expert in this area, but looking at the scsi target driver:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/scsi/targets/sd.c#5723
it
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
Why have all lists at opensolaris.org a -discuss ending? Its confusing.
They're not, hence opensolaris-code et al. The -discuss lists are
intended for general discussion about the bit before the -, so
zfs-discuss is for general discussions about ZFS, and
Hi all,
I see on the downloads page that [t]here are no plans to make the
following consolidations available as open source:
CDE
OpenWindows
SPARC networking drivers
HW Partners support
I understand that these are probably due to limitations of Sun's
resources,
Resources are exactly what's required. Unfortunately, the resources
needed are legal ones, i.e., lawyers that can track down 3rd party
licenses. Having a community member under NDA isn't going to able to do
that. It would take a lawyer with access to the licenses that Sun has
negotiated over
Rich,
I understand that these are probably due to limitations of Sun's
resources, however, is there any way that community members can
help here, even if under NDA?
Based on no direct knowledge whatsoever, I'd think it more likely that those
components have large amounts of code licensed to
Hi folks,
I am trying to configure ganglia to monitor our cluster but I am experiencing a
lot of problems. Initially, after a lot of compilation for different packages
(rrdtool, libart, freetype, and, of course, ganglia) I have the php application
running but the information of each node is
Hello Menno,
Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 3:44:38 PM, you wrote:
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
ML Did you have any zones configured perhaps? If zones are present
ML you won't be presented with
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64
workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
--
Best regards,
Robert
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ttp://milek.blogspot.com
Artem Kachitchkine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay,
Does anyone know how to calculate a new checksum for the DVD VTOC? Any help
would be greatly appreciated.
I'm not an expert in this area, but looking at the scsi target driver:
Hi,
I had implemented a JXTA plugin for Gaim to support group chat based on
JXTA[1][2] technology, to be more specific, MyJxta[3] group chat.
It is not perfect but is ready to use, and I am looking forward to use
it as basis to add more collaborative features can be offered by JXTA.
A few
Sarah Jelinek wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
Zones (zone upgrade not yet supported in Nevada, I think)?
No, not yet. Due
James C. McPherson wrote:
Sarah Jelinek wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
Zones (zone upgrade not yet supported in Nevada, I
James C. McPherson wrote:
Sarah Jelinek wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello opensolaris-discuss,
I had to re-install to snv_51 on my x64 workstation.
Installer didn't offer upgrade option - :(((
System was put on mirrored SVM volume.
Zones (zone upgrade not yet supported in Nevada, I
Sarah Jelinek wrote:
...
One other piece of data.. the zones upgrade project is very close to
putback. If you can hang tight until that integrates, another build
maybe, then you can do your upgrades.
Fortunately for me, the box that I've got zones on can wait until
I get back from Beijing in
How does Solaris load up its tasks and know when to say stop, no more please?
I am curious about this and figured I'd toss it out here. I could spend a
life time digging into The Magic Garden Explained or Solaris Internals
as well as man pages but the only person that would benefit is me.
If I
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
How does Solaris load up its tasks and know when to say stop, no more
please?
Provided the kernel doesn't run out of VM, I don't think the
Solaris kernel ever says that (I'm thinking here of pathalogical
fork-bomb experiments, where the load has gone
Firstly, thank you Rich for wading in here with your substantial skills on
the subject at hand. I was just thumbing and fumbling through Solaris
Systems Programming looking for the correct chapter.
I also have The Magic Garden Explained by Goodheart Cox here in my hands
and I note that the
You have hundreds of unzip operations to do, but observe a maximum
of only 34 at any one time. I guess it's possible that the number
of processes went higher between vmstat samples, but I think what
you're seeing here is the effect of some of those unzips finishing.
Let's try that with 1
bash-3.00# hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
remote: abort: repository hg/onnv/onnv-gate not found!
abort: no response from remote hg!
bash-3.00# date
Wed Nov 8 23:33:24 CST 2006
bash-3.00#
tj
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
resources at hand. They do a very fine job of totally protecting me from
such obscenities as :
:(){ :|: }; :
When presented to the bash shell that seems to really upset the system. IT
will completely crash a Red Hat Enterprise 4 server but my
Dennis Clarke wrote:
How does Solaris load up its tasks and know when to say stop, no more please?
I am curious about this and figured I'd toss it out here. I could spend a
life time digging into The Magic Garden Explained or Solaris Internals
as well as man pages but the only person that
40 matches
Mail list logo
