check out http://www.free-av.com
That's the same as avira.de
They have a Linux/FreeBSD/Solaris client.
/tony
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the input.
carlson > yes, I checked the netstat -rn, and the routing was correct.
Haven't done anything more about this, time issues.
/tony
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolari
>Next question: AFAIK, the le U-1 machines use sbus, is this true?
>Do ne need a s-Bus nexus driver?
We still support Sbus: Ultra-2 and the Ultra-Enterprise systems
also use Sbus I/O (Ultra-Enterprise supports both Sbus and PCI
I/O boards)
Casper
___
o
I think it would be nice if there were a file in which packages could
register the paths for their normal user (and administrative user) binaries,
along with a description of the package or application. That would allow
a script to be created that would offer various paths (traditional, xpg4, xpg6
On 2/20/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
>> On a personal workstation, you would expect
>> pkgadd
>> stall things in (say) /usr/bin where you can use them
>> directly in your PATH.
>
> This will work for Sun and Sun packages, but will actually break for a
thanks all looks like the only thing burning tonight is my headache I'll take
this up tomorrow thanks for all the responses truly appreciated...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensol
I still think feeding the lists to a dedicated news server could be the
cleanest approach to providing a way to read the messages by list in
a threaded manner. Either the groups could be read-only, or (my preference,
since I'd rather not use an email interface for something like this) they
could b
brad kelley wrote:
hmm can you suggest anything reliable...and no it can't be the solaris burning
tool.(unless you want to make me cry...) in the mean time I will fish
around the internet for linux burning tools...this k3b thing is not as free as
it advertises...I'm on my 7th dvd!
This
hmm can you suggest anything reliable...and no it can't be the solaris burning
tool.(unless you want to make me cry...) in the mean time I will fish
around the internet for linux burning tools...this k3b thing is not as free as
it advertises...I'm on my 7th dvd!
This message posted from
brad kelley wrote:
>boo hoo, burnt and hit the button to verify the data and it still doesn't
>work...I knew solaris would be hard for a newbie...little did I know it would
>be hard even before I tried it :(
>
>
>
Solaris isn't hard, it's the tools you are using to burn the DVD that
are givin
suse102:~/downloads/solaris/solzip # ls
sol-nv-b55b-x86-dvd-iso-a sol-nv-b55b-x86-dvd-iso-d
sol-nv-b55b-x86-dvd-iso-b sol-nv-b55b-x86-dvd-iso-e
sol-nv-b55b-x86-dvd-iso-c
just to confirm that
boo hoo, burnt and hit the button to verify the data and it still doesn't
work...I knew solaris would be hard for a newbie...little did I know it would
be hard even before I tried it :(
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discus
yes matched...so perhaps it is the k3b program?
c6d968d1761ba20178bf1cbec3b61734-from the k3b app which automatically
extracted this number
c6d968d1761ba20178bf1cbec3b61734 sol-nv-b55b-x86-dvd.iso from the
/root/downloads/solaris/md5sum_dvd_x86.list file
This message posted
brad kelley wrote:
>yes I had never done it before so hope i did it correctly.
>
>I opened the file md5sumDVD-x86-list and printed the results
>
>it showed 5 long numbers each corrosponding to one of the a-e zip files (again
>from my first post I did not unzip these but there was a non zipped fi
ok downloaded checked all md5's and gonna try again...this time I opened up the
zip files manually even though they were already opened and am going to try
making the dvd iso from the zips I opened..123 go...please work...hope I am
selecting the correct thing (burn dvd iso image).
This messa
Roland Mainz wrote:
Alan Burlison wrote:
Stephen Hahn wrote:
Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation idea, but the
"subscribers only" request contradicts the aims of most legitimate
forum posters.
Another alternative would be to moderate the first few posts from new
registrants. Th
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At least I and many other students would care since Ultra1 machines are
still very widespread and they've become quite cheap (at least we have
around 50-60 rotting in the cellar and I guess most german universities
have similar sto
Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At least I and many other students would care since Ultra1 machines are
> still very widespread and they've become quite cheap (at least we have
> around 50-60 rotting in the cellar and I guess most german universities
> have similar stockpiles around). P
James Carlson wrote:
> Tom Haynes writes:
> > Are there any legal ramifications in open sourcing the le(7D) driver?
[snip]
> - whether the code itself was based on either code or information
> (such as hardware manufacturer documentation) that is itself
> encumbered.
>
> As well as poten
Alan Burlison wrote:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation idea, but the
> > "subscribers only" request contradicts the aims of most legitimate
> > forum posters.
>
> Another alternative would be to moderate the first few posts from new
> registrants. This s
Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> * Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-18 15:10]:
> > Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
> > it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
> > subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are q
Hi Jeff,
> So now I am just trying to use the good 'ole simple shares (nfs server
> service is running) and I am getting permission denied from Solaris 9
> and 8 hosts and "no such file or directory" from RedHat. I have
> determined that I can mount on the older Solaris system using the "-o
> pub
Andrew Pattison writes:
> So am I right in saying that there is no easy way of getting a grub-like boot
> menu on SPARC?
Not yet ...
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Bur
So am I right in saying that there is no easy way of getting a grub-like boot
menu on SPARC?
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Eric Enright writes:
> On 2/20/07, Andrew Pattison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It sounds like disabling auto-boot and just typing "boot s9" or "boot s11"
> > would probably be the easiest way of doing it.
>
> I believe luactivate simply changes an NVRAM entry or two to set the
> root disk, and
The changes I made to the eeprom are as follows:
devalias s9 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0:a
devalias s11 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0:a
auto-boot? false
The system now boots to the "ok" prompt wh
Andrew Pattison writes:
> Since I downloaded Solaris 9 from Sun's website and am not paying
> for support, the only support available to me is "community support"
> i.e. mailing lists and web forums. Since OpenSolaris.org appears to
> have the highest traffic forums geared towards Solaris users, I
Try to mount it with the vers=2 option from Solaris 8 and 9.
mount -o vers=2 host:/share/path /mnt
Brett
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Elton wrote:
>I am at a loss... I tried to allocate a USB drive using Solaris 10 11/06 x86
>(TX enabled) and now I can allocate the cdrom. It doesn't even show up in the
>allocate gui. Tried command line and recieved the following error "Can't
>access DAC file for specified device"
>
>
>
Pl
I am at a loss... I tried to allocate a USB drive using Solaris 10 11/06 x86
(TX enabled) and now I can allocate the cdrom. It doesn't even show up in the
allocate gui. Tried command line and recieved the following error "Can't
access DAC file for specified device"
Prior to the USB attempt ev
thanks just printed it, looks like a real bag of giggles I'll report back
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 2/20/07, Andrew Pattison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It sounds like disabling auto-boot and just typing "boot s9" or "boot s11"
would probably be the easiest way of doing it.
I believe luactivate simply changes an NVRAM entry or two to set the
root disk, and then flags the appropriate BEs as
> The correct way to do it is like this:
>
> % pkgchk -l -p /usr/dt/bin/netscape
> Pathname: /usr/dt/bin/netscape
> Type: symbolic link
> Source of link: ../appconfig/netscape/netscape
> Referenced by the following packages:
> NSCPcom
> t status: installed
>
> %
>
> The
Andrew Pattison writes:
> How can I find out which Solaris package delivered which file? I'm trying to
> figure out which package delivers the decrepit Netscape 4.78 on Solaris 9,
> but it would be handy to know how to find this out for the general case as
> well.
The correct way to do it is li
How can I find out which Solaris package delivered which file? I'm trying to
figure out which package delivers the decrepit Netscape 4.78 on Solaris 9, but
it would be handy to know how to find this out for the general case as well.
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
It sounds like disabling auto-boot and just typing "boot s9" or "boot s11"
would probably be the easiest way of doing it.
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.o
brad kelley wrote:
yes I had never done it before so hope i did it correctly.
I opened the file md5sumDVD-x86-list and printed the results
it showed 5 long numbers each corrosponding to one of the a-e zip files (again
from my first post I did not unzip these but there was a non zipped file o
yes I had never done it before so hope i did it correctly.
I opened the file md5sumDVD-x86-list and printed the results
it showed 5 long numbers each corrosponding to one of the a-e zip files (again
from my first post I did not unzip these but there was a non zipped file of the
same name minux
On 2/20/07, brad kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, well using a suse system I downloaded the opensolaris express using the sun download
manager app. it created the images with files ending in a through e. it also had those in
zipped format but I did not bother opening them as from a ls
Hi all, well using a suse system I downloaded the opensolaris express using the
sun download manager app. it created the images with files ending in a through
e. it also had those in zipped format but I did not bother opening them as from
a ls -l they looked slightly small then the files of the
Hi Guys,
A primer... I was going to use zfs but have decided against it for now for
various reasons (not the least of which is we already invested $$$ in
intelligent hardware). So I destroyed all of my zfs setup and recreated file
systems using UFS (even going so far as destroying the LUNs on
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:07:52AM -0800, Holley wrote:
> IM BORED
+1
--
Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
IM BORED
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
HOLLEY IS COOL
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sabri Ali wrote:
Bonjour,
Comment savoir si mon serveur Sun Solaris "SunFire 210" est en 64 ou 32
bits
The kernel will always be 64 bit, userland applications can be either 64
or 32.
Solaris 10 and Solaris Express releases always install both 32 and 64
bit libraries and (where relevant) co
Hi,
isainfo(1) might help.
Regards,
J-F
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin wrote:
On a personal workstation, you would expect
pkgadd
stall things in (say) /usr/bin where you can use them
directly in your PATH.
This will work for Sun and Sun packages, but will actually break for any third
party packages, for example when trying to install them in
[ksh93-integration-disc
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: Gw3Zx
X-OpenSolaris-URL:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=95003&tstart=0#95003
This message means that you sho
Please do NOT reply to this address. If you have any problems,
feel free to send email to the alias "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Firefox 3.0 alpha2 contrib. builds on Solaris Nevada are now available
on mozilla.org.
It's still under development and *not* a stable release.
Download Page and Location
===
Bonjour,
Comment savoir si mon serveur Sun Solaris "SunFire 210" est en 64 ou 32
bits
D'avance Merci
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> > Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation
> idea, but the
> > "subscribers only" request contradicts the aims
> of most legitimate
> > forum posters.
>
> Another alternative would be to moderate the first
> few posts from new
> registrants. This should stop
Stephen Hahn wrote:
Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation idea, but the
"subscribers only" request contradicts the aims of most legitimate
forum posters.
Another alternative would be to moderate the first few posts from new
registrants. This should stop the spammers who register
> > BULLFROG 1200S UltraSPARC IIIi 1.28GHz
> > --
> > HDD 60GB 80GB Dual 60GB Dual 80GB
> >
>
> > 1GB SDRAM $27,014 $27,562 $28,183 $29,263
> > 2GB SDRAM $28,719 $29,263 $29,
SVOSUG is pleased to announce Carl Henslor, Sun Distinguished Engineer, who
will be speaking on InfiniBand. At last month's meeting Ben Rockwood
mentioned their use of iSCSI, and I thought the timing was good as I had been
asking Carl to speak to SVOSUG for a while, and Carl had just offered to
I have SXCR and Nexenta.
I recommend install both.
Nexenta is not so difficult update like SXCR or at all difficult.
To install printer is better in SXCR.
If you install Nexenta so you need download only one CD.
And then add many...
Martti
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
55 matches
Mail list logo
