Announcing new direction of Open Source NexentaOS development:
NexentaCP (Nexenta Core Platform).
NexentaCP is Dapper/LTS-based core Operating System Platform distributed
as a single-CD ISO, integrates Installer/ON/NWS/Debian and provides
basis for Network-type installations via main or third-part
>
> I ran into an issue with trying to install b65 onto a
> previously
> partitioned disk on an IBM stinkpad. The disk had
> three partitions:
> Solaris2 (b64a), Linux (Ubuntu 7) and Linux swap.
>
> I installed Ubuntu first, letting it overwrite the
> MBR with its GRUB
> and then proceeded
Awesome news! I've really enjoyed the ease with which OpenSound works
on my boxes. Thanks 4Front!
-- richard
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jason King wrote:
Interestingly, I saw someone have the exact same error messages while
trying to link Oracle on a reasonably recent Nevada build (might want to
check in database-discuss for details). Don't know if there is a
connection, but just seems a bit odd.
cheers, I will check the dat
Hi,
The error is from Sun ld(1).
We check to insure a symbol is really encapsulated by a backing section.
right. Im wonder to try this in S10, not in Nevada to see the results.
In the above, the symbol s44W_info is associated to section .text. The
.text section
is size 1042 (0x412), but t
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:09:06PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As monolithic as it may be, when you're building an entire
> platform, something of that nature is required to deliver
> it all. While it may be an unfamiliar task to Linux folks,
> it isn't to those from the BSD world.
>
> Simi
Interestingly, I saw someone have the exact same error messages while trying
to link Oracle on a reasonably recent Nevada build (might want to check in
database-discuss for details). Don't know if there is a connection, but
just seems a bit odd.
On 6/5/07, Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound
+1!
Adding icing to this cake is that Dev has been actively working
with several of us getting things ready for an OpenSolaris ARC
review of OSS as part of their initial code contribution!
Of course, this mean
+1
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
Folks,
The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June 14th). We will be offering the source code under CDDL to Solaris and GPLv2 for Linux BSD, OpenServer etc.
At this time, we'd like to propose that Open Sound be started as a project under th
>Folks,
>
>The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June
>14th). We will be offerin
g the source code under CDDL to Solaris and GPLv2 for Linux BSD, OpenServer
etc.
>
>At this time, we'd like to propose that Open Sound be started as a project
>under the Desktop Comm
Folks,
The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June 14th).
We will be offering the source code under CDDL to Solaris and GPLv2 for Linux
BSD, OpenServer etc.
At this time, we'd like to propose that Open Sound be started as a project
under the Desktop Community and
I ran into an issue with trying to install b65 onto a previously
partitioned disk on an IBM stinkpad. The disk had three partitions:
Solaris2 (b64a), Linux (Ubuntu 7) and Linux swap.
I installed Ubuntu first, letting it overwrite the MBR with its GRUB
and then proceeded to boot the b65 DV
The nForce4 is not hardware RAID. The RAID is performed in software by the
controller's BIOS, then by a driver loaded into the operating system once
booted.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
> > What is it that you actually want to do?
> Permissions must be cheinged[i]![/i]
> :)
> What reason don't accessed by root?
> I wish full access to my system!
I still don't understand.
Which permissions must be changed? Have you somehow damaged the system, or do
you mean you want to log in as
> I think troubles with sata don't with raid...
> raid work correctly but it's only different theme...
It completely irrelevant whether the hardware RAID works correctly or not.
The reason why Solaris doesn't "see" the SATA drives is because the SATA driver
for that RAID is not available. Whethe
> What is it that you actually want to do?
Permissions must be cheinged[i]![/i]
:)
What reason don't accessed by root?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> THere is none and even the uname(1) fields are
> unreliable if
> you compare different platforms.
Yes, that is a problem I ran into seven years ago when I was trying to design a
central NFS server that would store software for different operating systems
and different architectures (IRIX, IRIX
>You should configure all your disks to be visible as individual drives - no
>RAID, then you stand a chance of Solaris seeing the drives.
I think troubles with sata don't with raid...
raid work correctly but it's only different theme...
I have work with nonstandart raid mode ;)
I'ts possible with
> Workaround: Use "isainfo -k", I usually do this, i.e.
> here:
You have to consider that to be truly clean, a package must be a pure
relocatable package.
What does that mean?
For example, it means that ISA one is installing from is not the same as the
target ISA. Consider the scenario where
Thanks! I don't know about this link!
Cool!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Maybe need to starting within some keys like -noide
> -noraidide (like with knoppix)?
Solaris isn't GNU/Linux you know (:-)
> I have SATA II disks on nForce4's (raid/sata)
> Booting from OpenSolaris distributive don't see
> SATA's only one of my IDE HDD
Of course! Now it all makes sense.
The
> And more... How to installing, partitioning etc...
> for
> Open Solaris? Needs directly commands for newbie to
> me? :)
> How to install into a ready one partition? exemple
> /hde ?
> Please?
Newbie or not, you'll have to sit down and "warm up the chair". The
step-by-step documentation on inst
Maybe need to starting within some keys like -noide -noraidide (like knoppix)?
I have SATA II disks on nForce4's (raid/sata)
Booting from OpenSolaris distributive don't see SATA's only one of my IDE HDD
Message was edited by:
semiono
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> Hello! Where is a posting for a newbies? I'm sorry!
> Please anybode say me "howto" I got to replase all of
> perm in my Nexenta?
> in /dev /devices and others!? Only need it!
> Any is possible modes?...
You should not modify permissions of files in /dev/ and /devices/.
What is it that you actu
Hello! Where is a posting for a newbies? I'm sorry!
Please anybode say me "howto" I got to replase all of perm in my Nexenta?
in /dev /devices and others!? Only need it!
Any is possible modes?...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolari
>*BSD have flag days for similar reasons to Solaris -
>when you change (for example) the major number of libc,
>chances are things will care about this.
We do not have such flag days in Solaris.
We only have build environment flag days because ON is not
self-contained.
The flag days are typical
> I am still having trouble with this. Here is what I
> have done
>
> Downloaded and installed perl / mysql / gcc / make
Do yourself a favor, get Sun Studio compilers. They're gratis, generate up to
80% faster code, support Solaris (i86pc and sparc) and Linux, and have
optimization capabili
> So what the hell is going wrong?
PEBKAC problem? (:-)
> I guess it points to dynamic libraries being the
> issue so if so is this a Solaris 10 issue?
Having compiled tons and tons of software on Solaris, I seriously doubt it's a
"Solaris 10 issue".
What I can tell you is that compiling, link
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 16:36 +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:35:33AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> >
> >> One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
> >> mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Francois Saint-Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Beforing getting in the package management/installation stuff, I think we
need to solve a big problem here: ON build. The current build process is
really monolithic and unfriendly for new commers. What is all that
'nig
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:09:06PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
If I want to build just a specific kernel module, I cd to
usr/src/uts/intel/ip (for example, to build just ip) and
type "make all" in that directory.
Similarly I can do a "make" in vario
[b]Update :--[/b]
I thought I'd try to statically link the DBD::mysql module.
Not sure if this is the correct way to do this but heres what happened :-
[b]# perl Makefile.pl[/b]
Edited Makefile and changed LINKTYPE from dynamic to static
[b]#make
# make test_static[/b]
rm -f blib/arch/auto/DBD
James Carlson wrote:
Moinak Ghosh writes:
The thing that is missing is a make menuconfig like stuff that can allow
one to build a reduced set of kernel components or a reduced features
kernel.
Currently all kernel components are built.
Ugh. Please, let's not go the way of the sort o
Thanks for your replies
I am still having trouble with this. Here is what I have done
Downloaded and installed perl / mysql / gcc / make and associated support
packages from sunfreeware.com.
These all install into /usr/local
I have set up ${PATH} as follows :-
[b] /usr/local/bin:/usr/lo
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 08:08:16AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Francois Saint-Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Beforing getting in the package management/installation stuff, I think we
> > need to solve a big problem here: ON build. The current build process is
> > really monolithic an
Moinak Ghosh writes:
> The thing that is missing is a make menuconfig like stuff that can allow
> one to build a reduced set of kernel components or a reduced features
> kernel.
> Currently all kernel components are built.
Ugh. Please, let's not go the way of the sort of #ifdef madness that
trag
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:35:33AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been thinking
that the best option would be to include templates i
UNIX admin wrote:
>> UNIX admin wrote:
>>
>>> You like the tab feature of GNOME terminal? It's a
>>>
>> shame that GNOME terminal is slow and buggy.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Odd, it appears to be neither on my systems.
>>
>
> The problem is actutely exhibited when huge am
> And since you ENVISION Solaris to be an enterprise OS
> and Sun should pay its engineers to focus things more
> "IMPORTANT," why do you have gripes with "garbled"
> date format string in JDS running in zh_CN locale?
>
>
> Ivan.
Sorry I didn't mean to ignore your question. There is a long stor
>> UNIX admin wrote:
>> > You like the tab feature of GNOME terminal? It's a
>> shame that GNOME terminal is slow and buggy.
>> >
>> >
>> Odd, it appears to be neither on my systems.
>
>The problem is actutely exhibited when huge amounts of output ser sent to the
>terminal at very hig
h spee
> UNIX admin wrote:
> > You like the tab feature of GNOME terminal? It's a
> shame that GNOME terminal is slow and buggy.
> >
> >
> Odd, it appears to be neither on my systems.
The problem is actutely exhibited when huge amounts of output ser sent to the
terminal at very high speeds. The thi
41 matches
Mail list logo
