> That's why I didn??t encounter such failure when using the default installed
> studio?
>
> Where to get such heads-up information?
Usually here
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/
However I didn't find a heads-up addressing this particular compiler
option issue.
Sherry
> No, C++ ABI incompatibilities prevent this.
>
So the best bet is to do the whole thing with SS12, as i understand.
begin:vcard
fn:Manish Chakravarty
n:Chakravarty;Manish
org:SpikeSource Inc;Solution Engineering
adr:;;;Bangalore;Karnataka;56008;India
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Ass
Manish Chakravarty wrote:
>
> One question: now that i have compiled qt with suncc (ss12) , can i use
> gcc to compile applications that link to the sun-cc compiled qt?
> I ask this cause this would greatly simplify going after KDE4 dependencies
>
>
No, C++ ABI incompatibilities prevent this.
I
Hi everyone,
I was able to compile qt 4.3 on my SXDE box at.
For those who are interested (or those who are into qt programming, but
are solaris newbies like me , read on :-) )
1) Install the JDS CBE (Java Desktop System Common Build Enviroment)
JDS CBE is small, it's installation is easy.
htt
That's why I didn’t encounter such failure when using the default installed
studio?
Where to get such heads-up information?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sherry Moore
Sent: 2007年6月19日 13:01
To: joy get
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolar
You need to add the following line to your environment file:
__SSNEXT=
See usr/src/Makefile.master line 111 for details.
The error was caused by a change in the accepted compiler option for
specifying address mode. With Studio 12 only -xmodel=kernel is
accepted, while with previous versions of t
joy get wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build the b63, but failed with quite a lot build errors.
> One error info is like "Id: fatal: relocation error: R_AMD64_32: file
> ./debug64/unix.o: symbol header_kstat_update: value 0xfb861a60
> does not fit".
>
> The Solaris version on my system is
I just got a successful b63 build on snv_63. The default sun studio seems
working well.
Yours,
Allen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joy get
Sent: 2007年6月19日 12:53
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: [osol-discuss]
Hi,
I tried to build the b63, but failed with quite a lot build errors. One
error info is like "Id: fatal: relocation error: R_AMD64_32: file
./debug64/unix.o: symbol header_kstat_update: value 0xfb861a60 does
not fit".
The Solaris version on my system is snv_63. I didn't install the Dev
Does solaris have the similiar spin lock like linux spin_lock_t ?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thx!
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi;
Just thought I'd mention ... There is a Google SoC project that is doing
basically the same for FreeBSD. I am no fs expert but I did look up some
insteresting stuff for them.
An old but rather nice reference for a FAT on UNIX implementation is this:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/mac
MC wrote:
...
You can't dictionary brute force a fingerprint remotely, and you can't forget
your finger :)
Good fingerprint authentication is better than passwords in dare I say every way, EXCEPT
for when you are a high profile target who might be stalked for finger access. The
hordes of p
I can print successfully to printers in printers.conf, but no printers coming
from ldap.
For example these are the same printer first from ldap then from printers.conf
mathsunf(1,46): lpstat -a east
east not accepting requests since Mon Jun 18 17:33:49 2007
unknown reason
mathsunf(1,47):
Solaris 10 and upwards use a new Service Management Framework (SMF) in
preference to the traditional raft of init scripts.
The 2 steps I used to get Samba working on Solaris Nevada:
1. Create /etc/sfw/smb.conf , perhaps based on /etc/sfw/smb.conf-example which
Sun helpfully provide.
2. Start t
I believe samba is controlled as a service now.
Try this to see if it is running:
# svcs samba
Start and stop it like this:
# svcadm enable|disable samba
The config file is in /etc/sfw/ and the binary (should you need it) is
in /usr/sfw/sbin/ although it is probably best to run it with svcadm.
hi.
i have installated Solaris Express Build 65 but i don't find where a have to
"start" samba.
in the over build i use " /etc/init.d/samba start " in this?
thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opens
> this doesn`t boot inside vmware (5.x or server 1.x)
>
> the VM crashes if you use virtual scsi disk.
>
> looks like a vmware issue
Yup - I get an unhandled win32 exception is module vmware-vmx.exe .
If you use IDE instead (the default with a Solaris guest on VMWare Server) then
it works fine
Vineet Goel stated:
How to download kernel source code?
I am interested in building kernel on x86.
Thanks
Vineet
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:14:51 -0400> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Open
> Solaris HowTo on x86> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: > >
> > > Hi List,> >> > Could you show me the ref
> Hi List,
>
> Could you show me the refernce (e.g E-Book, Link, etc) that related with How
> to used Open Solaris from first installation (for x86) until software
> configuration.
Can you give this a try :
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
if anything looks wrong .. bugs you
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>> You can also try Dennis Clarke's "A Step by Step Guide to Installing
>> Solaris 10":
>>
>> http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
>>
>> I feel guilty for never bothering to send feedback to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>>
Mostly I get people t
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
You can also try Dennis Clarke's "A Step by Step Guide to Installing Solaris
10":
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
I feel guilty for never bothering to send feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
There is also a Solaris x86 FAQ at:
http://faq
You can also try Dennis Clarke's "A Step by Step Guide to Installing Solaris
10":
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
I feel guilty for never bothering to send feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
There is also a Solaris x86 FAQ at:
http://faq.solaris-x86.org/
Of course, one of the thi
this doesn`t boot inside vmware (5.x or server 1.x)
the VM crashes if you use virtual scsi disk.
looks like a vmware issue
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin wrote:
Still, with all that, I have to ask: is there an virus killer specifically
written for Solaris out there?
Or are all those solutions virus killers that run on Solaris, but check for
Windows virii?
Every virus scanner I've seen that runs on Solaris scans for
Windows viruses
Hi, Jean
Thank you for your explaination and your helpful advices :)
It seems you're right. After reading your guess, it reminded me that
something I've read from a book, Solairs Performance and Tools, and the
author talked about the decaying problem in this book.
2007/6/18, Jean-Francois Richa
On May 15, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Also my method of creating the actual iso files is unique, but can
be freely used by anyone who is interested. I already said a few
words on that during OSDEVCON2007. More documentation is to be
followed, as soon as I finally join the Ope
ok, i see.
Then, how can I correct this problem when using prstat?
Or is there any other statistics tool that could catch these short lived
processes correctly?
2007/6/18, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/18/07, Wee Yeh Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> prstat may miss
Stupid safari3 is c
Christopher Shore writes:
> Thanks for the response loomy. I reimaged the drive and it now saves my
> information I tell it to but still does not authenticate. I'm not sure if it
> matters or not but my router is an Apple Airport Extreme. Also the DNS
> entries are blank and in the Hosts tab
Niclas Sodergard writes:
> On 5/31/07, Anne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know if Solaris 10 has the ability to index all of it's contents
> > and those contents are available for query? (Akin to Red Hat's "locate" and
> > "updatedb" features.) The "find" command is so sllow
>
Dear all:
I'm compiling the ON build 65's source code now, using "nightly
opensolaris.sh" command.
The prstat reports that system is very idle, but the load average tells me
that the system is very busy. -,-
And then I check the vmstat report, it shows the system is busy now, too.
Following are
If you are thinking that OpenSolaris is an installable OS have a look at
http://opensolaris.org/os/about/ where it states:
[i]The main difference between the OpenSolaris project and the Solaris
Operating System is that the OpenSolaris project does not provide an end-user
product or complete di
Hello All,
This is just a reminder that this month's LOSUG meeting will take place this Wednesday, 20/06/2007, and is entitled
"Solaris Troubleshooting – The Unofficial Tourist Guide". I am certain that it will prove to be very informative indeed.
If you would like to attend, please visit
> UNIX admin wrote:
> > Since this is Solaris, how would you compromise a
> browser?
>
> Surely you jest? Just wait for a buffer overflow
> attack against the
> browser, for example
> http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2006/mfsa2006
> -44.html. It's
> not as if Mozilla/Firefox have neve
Hi Artem,
Thank you. I'll prepare for it.
>
> Given the apparent support of BioAPI by various organizations including
> NIST and the existence of a bunch of code including PAM support
the pam_bioapi in the website doesn't support dual-mode.
> (http://www.bioapi.org/devtools.asp), the issue wi
I suggest Avira Antivir, they make an excellent product that also works on
Solaris among other UNICES. It's free for use. Not open source though, but
unlike most open source antiviral products, at least it gets regular updates.
And yes, UNIX systems DO need an antivirus product, especially when
This design is for operation system level. The preboot authentication
may require EFI(Extensible Firmware Interface) support. So that it can
not be considered until EFI is supported by solaris. Thanks.
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 09:16, Gary Gendel wrote:
> +1
>
> Keep in mind that you may want your ar
I don't think my design has much overlap. The fingerprint drivers are
required whether bioapi is used or not. The fingerprint tool is based on
PAM, independent on bioapi.
I'll post my detailed design document after the inception review or the
opensolaris project page is built. Thanks.
PSARC 20
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Martin Cerveny wrote:
Hello,
I've put a webrev of the so-far tested part of the
rewrite here:
http://cr.grommit.com/~frankho/webrev-pcfs/
if you're curious. There's far more to come,
trickling in ever so slowly.
Can you make webrev compare against ssh://[EMAIL PR
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:09, Giles Turner wrote:
> On 6/16/07, Gaopeng Chen - Sun China <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now it just focuses on the fingerprint. The design is required to be
> > able to easily extended to other biometrics. If the resources in
> > opensolaris are enough, the bioAPI ma
On 6/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good fingerprint authentication is better than passwords in dare I say every
way, EXCEPT for whe
n you are a high profile target who might be stalked for finger access. The
hordes of people out t
here using simple passwords like "pas
>> Good fingerprint authentication is better than passwords in dare I say every
>> way, EXCEPT for whe
n you are a high profile target who might be stalked for finger access. The
hordes of people out t
here using simple passwords like "password" would be better protected with any
biometric.
>
UNIX admin wrote:
Since this is Solaris, how would you compromise a browser?
Surely you jest? Just wait for a buffer overflow attack against the
browser, for example
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2006/mfsa2006-44.html. It's
not as if Mozilla/Firefox have never had security probl
44 matches
Mail list logo
