Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
> Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour of the less command
> between b72 and b76. It now clears the screen at exit which I find most
> annoying. Or is it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
>
> Anyway, why have the behaviour changed???
The terminfo d
> > Martin Bochnig wrote:
> > > The funniest thing: I'm still only a plain
> > contributor in the xwin-community, so is Moinak
> > Ghosh!!!
> > >
> > Have you emailed the X Window System Community and
> > asked for core
> > contributor status? I'm sure you are more than
> > qualified.
> >
> >
> I've tried tracing and pinging it from my own machine and various online
> tools and it looks dead. Does anyone know what's up?
Yeah, I know exactly whats up.
# uptime
6:37pm up 12 min(s), 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.06, 0.09
#
new disk .. new mirrors.
The strange thing is, when I ho
I've tried tracing and pinging it from my own machine and various online tools
and it looks dead. Does anyone know what's up?
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolar
> I went through the xwin-discuss mailman archives (not
> Jive) from May
> 2006 to November 2006
2007
"Last" August, err this, not next ...
But it doesn't matter, as the whole system is a source of in-equality in case
of so many people (who unfortunately never ever complain).
[...]
> Why?
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
> > When watching http://poll.opensolaris.org/ you
> will see, that Moinak has only a single core
> contributor title and two plain "contributor" titles.
> That shows that this system isn't properly set-up.
> >
> The "system" is functioning as it was intended to.
> Moi
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
> > The funniest thing: I'm still only a plain
> contributor in the xwin-community, so is Moinak
> Ghosh!!!
> >
> Have you emailed the X Window System Community and
> asked for core
> contributor status? I'm sure you are more than
> qualified.
>
> cheers,
> steve
> --
Hi, I'm currently (and temporarily) online again, after a
"business-deal"-travel related interruption.
I found that parts of my original statement may sound ambiguous. I would like
to correct this now.
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> The funniest thing: I'm still only a plain
> contributor in the xwin-c
Seems like a concluding remark is long overdue. All those video driver
problems disappeared with SXCE 76. In all honesty, I never had any doubt that
it will be fixed in due time, but just never thought would be so quick.
Somebody must have been working overtime while we were mudwrestling on t
Hi all,
I see notices in the Solaris 10 Docs that NIS+ may not be available in
the future. Has a date been set for it's demise?
Also I notice that the NIS+ Documentation is missing from the Solaris
Express Documentation Cluster. Is this a mistake, or is it's removal
intended for Solaris 11 (or
try:
# ifconfig rtls1 plumb
# ifconfig -a
to check whether rtls1 is there.
It's better not to have both NIC to be of same chipset,
when more than one OS is being used, you'll be mad on
0/1/2numberings for different OSes.
clarence
This message posted from opensolaris.org
for x86/x64 boxes, Wake-on-LAN is a NIC/Mainboard thing, nothing to
be related to Opensolaris, IMHO.
I'd used "wol [-i ] macaddress on all those boxes and use
grub-set-default for OSes selection.
no known problems, so far.
Clarence CHU
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour
> of the less command between b72 and b76. It now
> clears the screen at exit which I find most annoying.
> Or is it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
> >
> > Anyway, why have the beha
Thommy M. Malmström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour of the less command
> between b72 and b76. It now clears the screen at exit which I find most
> annoying. Or is it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
>
> Anyway, why have the behaviour change
Seems as if there was a change in default behaviour of the less command between
b72 and b76. It now clears the screen at exit which I find most annoying. Or is
it the GNOME terminal that has changed???
Anyway, why have the behaviour changed???
man less
[...]
-X or --no-init
Dis
On 17/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You can email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request your account
> > be deleted if you feel it absolutely needs to be explicitly deleted.
> > But there is no harm in keeping it around for when and if yo
Ok now I am just guessing
Have you compiled your C or C++ program with the -g flag. The flag is used to
store the debug information so that the debugger can use to to display the
names. It may solve your problem
Thanks,
Tirthankar
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
